Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two writ petitions filed against the Industrial Court and State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought unspecified relief challenging the administrative actions of the Industrial Court authorities.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
Admin
2026-07-28 10:18:02
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.7830 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (06) 22

Writ Petition No. 7830 of 2024 and Writ Petition No. 7831 of 2024

2025-06-21

A. S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata, JJ.

2025:BHC-AS:24552-DB

Mr. Aditya S. Raktade for Petitioner in both Petitions; Mr. K.S. Thorat, ‘B’ Panel for Respondent No.1-State in WP/7830/2024; Ms. Tanu N. Bhatia, AGP for Respondent No.1-State in WP/7831/2024; Mr. R.S. Datar for Respondent Nos.2 and 3

Kiran Ramesh Shinde and Devdas Kerba Chougale

State of Maharashtra, General Administrative Department; President, Industrial Court, Maharashtra; Registrar, Industrial Court, Maharashtra (in WP 7830 of 2024); State of Maharashtra and President, Industrial Court, Maharashtra (in WP 7831 of 2024)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking relief against the Industrial Court, Maharashtra and the State Government.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Writ Petition Industrial Court General Administrative Department

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two writ petitions filed against the Industrial Court and State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought unspecified relief challenging the administrative actions of the Industrial Court authorities. 2026-07-28 10:18:02
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement and Lack of Specific Allegations Against In-Laws. The court held that where parties have settled and allegations are vague against relatives, continuation of proceedings is an a... 2026-07-28 10:18:01
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition acquittal natural justice Murder compensation burden of proof benefit of doubt limitation circumstantial evidence Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising Out of Use ...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability A...

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antec...

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Rajya Sabha Nomination Due ...

Supreme Court Allows Pension to Casual Labourers with Temporary Status in Department of Po...

Lost Your Password?