Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two writ petitions filed against the Industrial Court and State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought unspecified relief challenging the administrative actions of the Industrial Court authorities.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
Admin
2026-10-27 18:35:35
  • 81
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.7830 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (06) 22

Writ Petition No. 7830 of 2024 and Writ Petition No. 7831 of 2024

2025-06-21

A. S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata, JJ.

2025:BHC-AS:24552-DB

Mr. Aditya S. Raktade for Petitioner in both Petitions; Mr. K.S. Thorat, ‘B’ Panel for Respondent No.1-State in WP/7830/2024; Ms. Tanu N. Bhatia, AGP for Respondent No.1-State in WP/7831/2024; Mr. R.S. Datar for Respondent Nos.2 and 3

Kiran Ramesh Shinde and Devdas Kerba Chougale

State of Maharashtra, General Administrative Department; President, Industrial Court, Maharashtra; Registrar, Industrial Court, Maharashtra (in WP 7830 of 2024); State of Maharashtra and President, Industrial Court, Maharashtra (in WP 7831 of 2024)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking relief against the Industrial Court, Maharashtra and the State Government.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Writ Petition Industrial Court General Administrative Department

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Seniority in Administrative Services — Validity of Year of Allotment Concept Struck Down. 2026-10-28 20:12:24
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Parole Extension for Convict Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough & Parole) Rules, 1959 — Rule 25 Confers Discretion to Extend Parole Up to 90 Days. The court held that failure to consider discretion under Rule 25 amounts to fail... 2026-10-28 20:12:24
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Espionage Case Due to Procedural Errors. The High Court's re...

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Income Tax Matters Due to Non-Issuance of Notic...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Enforcement Case — Clarification on Paymen...

Lost Your Password?