High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two writ petitions filed against the Industrial Court and State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought unspecified relief challenging the administrative actions of the Industrial Court authorities.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 75
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.7830 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (06) 22

Writ Petition No. 7830 of 2024 and Writ Petition No. 7831 of 2024

2025-06-21

A. S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata, JJ.

2025:BHC-AS:24552-DB

Mr. Aditya S. Raktade for Petitioner in both Petitions; Mr. K.S. Thorat, ‘B’ Panel for Respondent No.1-State in WP/7830/2024; Ms. Tanu N. Bhatia, AGP for Respondent No.1-State in WP/7831/2024; Mr. R.S. Datar for Respondent Nos.2 and 3

Kiran Ramesh Shinde and Devdas Kerba Chougale

State of Maharashtra, General Administrative Department; President, Industrial Court, Maharashtra; Registrar, Industrial Court, Maharashtra (in WP 7830 of 2024); State of Maharashtra and President, Industrial Court, Maharashtra (in WP 7831 of 2024)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking relief against the Industrial Court, Maharashtra and the State Government.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Deduction Under Section 80IB for Assessee Engaged in Manufacture Through Job Workers. Workers Supplied by Contractor Count Towards Employee Requirement Under Section 80IB(2)(iv).
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Lecturer's Petition for CAS Benefits for Prior Polytechnic Service Under UGC Regulations. Prior service in polytechnic not considered 'approved service' under UGC Regulations, 2010 for Career Advancement Scheme.