Summary of Judgement
- Maintainability of Appeal: Rejection letters from JDGFT constitute appealable decisions under Section 15. The ADGFT acted within its jurisdiction.
- Non-Speaking Orders: Administrative or quasi-judicial decisions must articulate clear reasoning for transparency and accountability.
- Remand for Fresh Adjudication: JDGFT must reconsider the application with proper reasoning, ensuring fair hearing and adherence to legal principles.
1. Case Overview:
- Petitioner: Ashwini Ashish Dighe, a business operator engaged in manufacturing optical fibers under "Sunteck Telecommunications."
- Respondents: Union of India and several trade officials.
- Issue: Rejection of an MEIS duty credit scrip application for exports warehoused in a Free Trade and Warehousing Zone (FTWZ) and subsequent appeal dismissal by ADGFT.
2. Background:
- Initial Rejection (2020): Application for MEIS scrip benefits rejected for lack of evidence correlating exports to the benefits claimed.
- Opportunity Provided (2021): Court allowed fresh submission of evidence.
- Second Rejection (2022): JDGFT rejected the application, citing Paragraph 3.06 of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), which deems exports from FTWZ units ineligible.
3. Legal Contentions:
- Petitioner: Challenged the appeal dismissal, asserting maintainability under Sections 9 and 15 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. Claimed JDGFT’s rejection lacked reasoning.
- Respondents: Defended the rejection, arguing the appeal was filed with the wrong authority (ADGFT) and that the supplies were ineligible under the FTP.
4. High Court's Analysis:
- Adjudicating Authority: The JDGFT was deemed to have adjudicating authority for this purpose under Section 15, despite objections from the respondents.
- Appeal Jurisdiction: The ADGFT was held competent to hear the appeal, as per government notification and Section 15(1)(b).
- Speaking Order Requirement: The court emphasized the need for a speaking order to justify the JDGFT's rejection of the MEIS scrip application.
Legal Framework:
Subjects:
Foreign Trade Law, Administrative Law, Quasi-Judicial Decisions.
#MEISScrip #ForeignTradeAct1992 #AdministrativeLaw #JudicialReview #TradePolicy
Case Title: Ashwini Ashish Dighe Versus The Union Of India & Ors.
Citation: 2024 LawText (BOM) (12) 118
Case Number: WRIT PETITION NO.350 OF 2024
Date of Decision: 2024-12-11