Supreme Court Grants Bail Pending Appeal Due to Length of Sentence Served. Appellant Deserves Release on Bail During Appeal Process Considering Over Five Years of Sentence Served.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a petition for special leave to appeal against a judgment and order from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petitioner, Fazal, sought relief after serving more than five years of his sentence. The Supreme Court, upon hearing the arguments presented by both sides, considered the application for exemption from filing an official translation and allowed it. The court also condoned the delay in filing the special leave petition. The primary legal issue was whether the appellant should be granted bail while the appeal was pending. The court concluded that the appellant had served a significant portion of his sentence and thus deserved to be released on bail, directing that this release be subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. The decision underscored the court's consideration of the time already served by the appellant as a critical factor in its ruling.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Grant of Bail Pending Appeal - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section Not mentioned - The court considered the duration of the appellant's sentence served and determined that the appellant deserved to be released on bail during the appeal process, subject to the Trial Court's satisfaction. Held that the appellant's continued incarceration was not warranted given the circumstances (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant should be granted bail during the pendency of the appeal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court granted bail to the appellant during the pendency of the appeal, subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Exemption from filing
  • Delay condonation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (SC) (04) 19

Crl No. 8155/2011

2012-04-09

H.L. Dattu, Chandramauli Kr. Prasad

R.S. Rathi, Kusum, Prabhat Kumar, Ratnakar Dash, Vikrant Yadav, Kamlendra Mishra

Fazal

State of U.P.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal

Remedy Sought

Bail during the pendency of the appeal

Previous Decisions

Judgment and order from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Issues

Grant of bail pending appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant has served more than 5 years of sentence and deserves bail Respondent's arguments not mentioned

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the significance of the duration of the sentence served as a basis for granting bail.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant deserves to be released on bail. We direct that, during the pendency of the appeal, the appellant be released on bail.

Procedural History

The petition was filed for special leave to appeal against the judgment and order of the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced. The absence of the award copy with the notice hindered the appellant's ability to seek reference effectively, leading to the conclusion that the application was not barre...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Educational Institutions to Fill Unfilled NRI Seats in Medical Colleges — Clarifies Admission Process. The Court ruled that unfilled NRI seats should be filled by institutions based on merit, not shared with the State.