Supreme Court Allows Translocation of Asiatic Lions for Conservation Efforts — Upholds Need for Second Home.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a public interest litigation concerning the translocation of Asiatic lions from the Gir National Park in Gujarat to Kuno Wildlife Sanctuary in Madhya Pradesh. The applicants, Centre for Environment Law, WWF-I, argued for the necessity of a second home for the endangered species to ensure their long-term survival. The Wildlife Institute of India had conducted extensive research indicating that Kuno was a historically suitable habitat for the lions, and a series of surveys confirmed its viability. The Madhya Pradesh government had initiated a rehabilitation package for villagers residing in Kuno, which required legal approval under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The Ministry of Environment and Forests approved the diversion of forest land for this purpose. However, the Gujarat government opposed the translocation, citing concerns over prey availability and the presence of tigers in Kuno. The court analyzed the arguments from both states, emphasizing the importance of scientific input and the need for a second home for the lions to prevent potential extinction risks. Ultimately, the court upheld the necessity of the translocation, directing the involved parties to cooperate in the conservation efforts. The decision underscored the legal and ecological imperatives for protecting the Asiatic lion population.

Headnote

A) Wildlife Conservation - Translocation of Species - Necessity for Second Home - Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Section 12(bb) - The court recognized the need for a second habitat for Asiatic lions to mitigate risks of extinction due to limited geographical spread and threats from natural calamities. It held that scientific studies supported the translocation to Kuno as a viable conservation strategy (Paras 1-30).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the translocation of Asiatic lions from Gujarat to Kuno Wildlife Sanctuary in Madhya Pradesh is necessary for their long-term survival.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court directed the translocation of Asiatic lions from Gujarat to Kuno Wildlife Sanctuary, emphasizing the need for a second habitat to ensure their long-term survival and mitigate risks associated with their limited geographical distribution.

Law Points

  • Wildlife conservation
  • translocation of species
  • ecological balance
  • Forest (Conservation) Act
  • 1980
  • Wild Life (Protection) Act
  • 1972
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (SC) (04) 133

I.A. No. 100 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 337 of 1995

2012-02-27

K. S. Radhakrishnan

Shri Raj Panjwani, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Shri P. K. Malhotra, Shri P. S. Narasimha, Shri Shyam Divan

Centre for Environment Law, WWF-I

Union of India & Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public interest litigation regarding the translocation of Asiatic lions.

Remedy Sought

Direction for implementation of the re-location programme for Asiatic lions.

Filing Reason

To seek enforcement of conservation measures for the endangered species.

Previous Decisions

Previous discussions and approvals by the National Board for Wildlife regarding the translocation.

Issues

Is the translocation of Asiatic lions necessary for their conservation? What are the ecological implications of relocating lions to Kuno?

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant argued for the urgent need for a second home for Asiatic lions based on scientific studies. The State of Gujarat contended that the current population is stable and does not require translocation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the translocation of Asiatic lions is essential for their conservation, supported by scientific evidence and the need for ecological balance.

Judgment Excerpts

The necessity of a second home for Asiatic lions was one of the issues deliberated upon in that meeting. Kuno was found to be the most suitable site for re-introduction in establishing a free ranging population of Asiatic lions. The court recognized the need for a second habitat for Asiatic lions to mitigate risks of extinction.

Procedural History

The case progressed through various hearings and submissions from both the applicant and the respondents, with significant discussions held by the National Board for Wildlife regarding the translocation of Asiatic lions.

Acts & Sections

  • Wild Life (Protection) Act: 12(bb)
  • Forest (Conservation) Act: 2
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Fishery Public Auction Notice for Periyur Periya Kanmoi. Petitioner Claims Hereditary Fishery Rights Based on 1942 Court Auction Sale and Seeks Quashing of Auction Notice Under Article 226.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Homicide Case — Conviction Modified. The court found the incident lacked premeditation and the accused were not armed, leading to a conviction under Section 304 IPC instead of murder.