Gujarat High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. The detention order under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 was set aside as the detaining authority failed to provide material indicating disturbance to public order....

The petitioner, Dashrathbhai Dineshbhai Salat, was preventively detained by an order dated 27/02/2025 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere FIRs do not justify preventive detention without evidence of threat to public order....

The petitioner, Aakib @ Gani Ganibhai Belim, was preventively detained by an order dated 29/01/2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger Due to Lack of Material Showing Threat to Public Order. Detention under Section 2(b) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention....

The petitioner, Ganeshbhai S/o Appa Bhadane, was preventively detained by an order dated 30/01/2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Surat, classifying him as a bootlegger under Section 2(b) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention....

The petitioner, Ravi S/o Krushna@Krishna Tiwari, was preventively detained by the Police Commissioner, Surat, vide order dated 30/01/2026, classifying him as a 'dangerous person' under Section 2(c) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger Due to Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs under Prohibition Act does not establish threat to public order....

The petitioner, Manoj @Manish Sureshbhai Hiralal Nainvani, was preventively detained by an order dated 28/01/2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-soc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Revision by Union of India in Arbitration Award Execution — Interest Calculation Upheld. Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree; Order Directing Deposit of Outstanding Amount with Interest at 15% Per Annum Sustained....

The Union of India filed a revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against an order dated 02.05.2003 passed by the Judge, Court No.11, City Civil Court, Ahmedabad in Execution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Contract Damages Case — Failure to Prove Breach and Loss. Trial court's finding that plaintiff failed to establish defendant's breach and quantum of damages under Section 96 CPC upheld....

The State of Gujarat and another (appellants) filed a suit for recovery of damages against the contractor Anil J. Jhatakia (respondent) for alleged breach of a contract for the Venu-2 Irrigation Schem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Full Back Wages in Industrial Dispute Case. Termination of Workman Found Illegal as Enquiry Was Not Properly Conducted and No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given....

The petitioner, Baburao Koli, was employed as a Driller with the respondent company, J.P. Extrusiontech Ltd., since 01.02.1996, with a last drawn salary of Rs. 16,804/-. He was terminated from service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Tractor Accident During Agricultural Work Entitles Claimant to Compensation Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Court holds that use of tractor for threshing wheat is incidental to agriculture and claimant is a third party entitled to compensation....

The appellant, Prahladbhai Punjabhai Solanki, was the original claimant in a motor accident claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. He was a labourer engaged in agriculture ...