Gujarat High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Enhances Compensation Under Conventional Heads. 10% Contributory Negligence Upheld in Head-on Collision Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173....

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of deceased Nirmalkumar Lavkumar Thakar, who died in a collision between his motorcycle and a mini truck on 14.03.2014. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Enhances Compensation for Deceased Contractor in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal's Rejection of Income Tax Returns Without Cogent Reasons Set Aside. Income Assessed at Rs.20,833 per Month Based on IT Returns, 40% Future Prospects Added, Multiplier of 15 Applied Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 31.08.2019 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux), Bhuj-Kachchh, in MACP No.302/2013, whereby the Tribunal awarded compensation to the cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Car Driver Proved, Income of Deceased Assessed at Rs.2,500 per Month. The court upheld the Tribunal's award of Rs.3,79,000 with 9% interest for death of pillion rider in a scooter-car collision under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appellants, original claimants, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 16.10.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Trib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal, Sets Aside Contributory Negligence Finding and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim. Rear-End Collision Presumption Applied Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appellant, Dilipkumar Bhailalbhai Thakkar, filed a first appeal against the judgment and award dated 16.10.2012 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxiliary) at Vadodara in MACP No.662/2002. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as the detaining authority failed to demonstrate how the alleged activities of the detenue affected public order rather than mere law and order....

The petitioner, Taj Mohammad @ Haider, was preventively detained by the Commissioner of Police, Surat, vide order dated 30.01.2026, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985, as...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material on Public Order. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere criminal antecedents do not justify preventive detention without showing threat to public order....

The petitioner, Sahilkhan @ Mota Maniyar Rashidahemad Pathan, through his mother Sama Sultana Rashidahemad Pathan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 28.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Set Aside as Mechanical and Without Application of Mind....

The petitioner, Vikas Chamanbhai Mangabhai Patni, was preventively detained by an order dated 23.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish breach of public order....

The petitioner, Jakir @Chuo Azizbhai Shaikh, was preventively detained by the District Magistrate, Himmatnagar, vide order dated 28.11.2025, classifying him as a 'dangerous person' under Section 2(c) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement for Canal Project — Adjacent Village Precedent Applied. Market value fixed at Rs.308.25 per sq. mtr. with additional compensation of Rs.228.25 per sq. mtr. under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for land acquired under same Section 4 notification as adjacent village....

The appellant, Patel Sanjaybhai Chaganbhai, filed first appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the compensation awarded by the Reference Court in LAR Case Nos. 798/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Due to Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention Order Set Aside as Mechanical and Without Application of Mind....

The petitioner, Manoj S/o Kantibhai Marvadi, was preventively detained by the Police Commissioner, Surat, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985, as a 'dangerous person' vide...