Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Bhatu S/o Himmat Akhade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for the murder of his wife Sangita and for attempting to commit suicide, under Sections 302 and 309 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Narayan Shivram Kavale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for the murder of Tanaji under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was related to deceased and her testimony was inconsistent with medical evidence and other circumstances....

The case arises from two criminal appeals filed against the judgment and order dated 19/01/2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, District Beed in Sessions Case No. 18 of 2011. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for throttling wife set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Raju Dayal Shrimali @ Khimji, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Thane for the murder of his wife under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case was th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father-in-Law for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on Minor Daughter-in-Law. Victim's Credible Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 376, 506(II) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act....

The appellant, Tukaram Pandurang Mhaske, was convicted by the Designated Judge under the POCSO Act for offences under Sections 376 and 506(II) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 6 of the Prote...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Takes Suo Moto Cognizance of COVID-19 Public Health Infrastructure in Maharashtra. Court Refers to Earlier Principal Seat Judgment Highlighting State's Obligation Under Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 and Disaster Management Act, 2005....

On 26.06.2020, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, registered Suo Moto Criminal Public Interest Litigation No.1 of 2020 to address issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as death caused by accidental fall, not intentional poisoning....

The appellant, Rama Ghongde, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his son Ashutosh by poisoning. The prosecution case was that the appellant, addicted to liquor and not working, frequ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of Deepak S/o Pundalik Ingale and Chhayabai W/o Pundalik Ingale under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner Who Did Not Participate in Tender Cannot Challenge Its Award Without Showing Public Interest or Mala Fides....

The petitioner, K.P. Ibrahim, filed a writ petition challenging the award of a tender by the Public Works Department, Government of Goa, for a construction contract. The petitioner did not participate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Concealment of Income in Land Sale Transaction. Assessee failed to disclose receipt of advance sale consideration in return, leading to penalty for concealment....

The appellant-assessee, along with four others, executed an agreement for sale of a plot of land at Vasai on 07.12.2004 for a total consideration of Rs.2,60,00,000. The appellant's share was 49.2%. Du...