All Blogs

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application Under Section 340 CrPC Against Caveator in Probate Proceedings for Alleged Forged Will. Application Alleged Forgery of Will Dated 23 March 2023 and Sought Inquiry Under Sections 463, 464, 465, 467, 471 IPC....

The proceedings before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, concerned an Interim Application No. 1809 of 2024 filed under Section 340 read with Section 195 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Personal Effects Exclusion Under Section 2(14) Income Tax Act in Vintage Car Capital Gains Appeal. Intimate Connection with Person Required; Mere Capability of Personal Use Does Not Make Asset Personal Effects....

Background — The appeal arose from an income tax assessment for assessment year 1992-1993 concerning the sale of a vintage car. The assessee, a salaried employee of M/s. Indu Nishan Oxo-Chemical Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Small Causes Court Has Jurisdiction Over Encroachment Beyond Demised Premises Under Section 28 of Bombay Rent Act. Tenant Challenges Eviction Decree Arising from Alleged Permanent WC and Mezzanine Floor Without Landlord Consent....

The litigation arose from a landlord-tenant dispute over alleged unauthorized permanent additions and alterations in tenanted premises situated at Plot No.866, TP Scheme No.IV, old Prabhadevi Road, Da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Section 34 Challenge to NSE Arbitral Awards on Limitation Grounds. Court Holds Three-Month Time Limit Under NSE Bye-laws Rule 13(b) is Directory and First Hearing Date Under Rule 13(d) is Date of Actual Hearing, Not Scheduled Hearing....

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by an investor challenging an appellate arbitral award dated September 25, 2013 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Second Appeal Subject to Cost in Consumer Complaint Restoration Case — Delay Condoned and Complaint Restored on Payment of Rs. 10,000. Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Condonation of delay and restoration of complaint dismissed for non-prosecution....

The case involves a second appeal before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) against an order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi, which had dismissed th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Appeal in Insurance Fraud Case Due to Allegations of Forgery and Fraud Beyond Consumer Forum Jurisdiction. Consumer Fora Cannot Adjudicate Matters Involving Serious Allegations of Forgery and Fabrication of Documents as Per Supreme Court Precedent....

The case involves a second appeal before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission against an order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh. The appellants, Umesh ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Injunction in Commercial Dispute Over Land Transfer. Section 9 of Arbitration Act Does Not Confer Right to Injunction Against Third Party Transferee Without Prima Facie Case of Fraud or Collusion....

The appellants, Vasudev Garg, Chaitanya Garg, and Radhika Baig, filed a Commercial Appeal under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated 10.06.2025 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order Issuing Regular Summons in Summary Suit — Directs Fresh Summons Under Form No.4 CPC. Court Holds That in a Summary Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC, the Trial Court Must Issue Summons in Form No.4 and Cannot Suo Motu Decide Maintainability at the Stage of Issuing Summons....

The petitioner, engaged in the business of gems and jewellery, filed a suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking summary recovery of Rs. 4,14,50,000/- from the respondents,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considered Second Appeal Challenging Concurrent Decree for Possession Under Hindu Succession Act. The Appeal Raised Questions on Right of Residence of Daughters Under Sections 23 and 14 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956....

The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from a suit for possession of ancestral property filed by the plaintiff, the widow of Laxman, against the original defendants, the daught...