All Blogs

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Withdrawal of Second Appeal in Vehicle Purchase Dispute — Discrepancy in Refund Amount to be Addressed via Review Before District Forum. Appellant Bank permitted to file review regarding actual amount paid by complainant....

The case pertains to a Second Appeal filed before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) against the order dated 17.04.2025 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Validity of Reassessment Notices Issued Under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Core Contention Revolves Around Limitation Period and Applicability of Section 150 in Light of Tribunal Order Quashing Original Assessment....

The writ petitions were filed by LTIMindtree Limited, a public limited company engaged in software development and export, challenging reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Workers' Appeals Against Quashing of Reinstatement Award in Industrial Dispute. Labour Court's Award of Reinstatement and Back Wages Was Set Aside by Single Judge; Workers Challenged in Letters Patent Appeals Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947....

The matter arose from retrenchment of five permanent workmen by M/s. Advani Oerlikon Limited, now known as M/s. Ador Welding Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its fact...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Income Tax Appeal on Set Off of Interest Expenditure Under Section 36(1)(iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee Company Challenges Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Order Restoring Assessing Officer's Disallowance of Interest Expenditure Against Interest Income for Assessment Year 1992-93....

By this appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the assessee, a private limited company incorporated on 17 February 1992 under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged the order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Landlord-Bank in Rent Control Eviction Matter Due to Unlawful Subletting and Bonafide Requirement. Partnership Deed Treated as Camouflage for Subletting Under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, Affirming Concurrent Factual Findings....

These civil revision applications arose from two eviction suits filed by Sangli Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd, a cooperative bank registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Execution Court Order in Land Acquisition Dispute — Defense Estate Officer Succeeds in Setting Aside Ex-Parte Order Due to Lack of Notice. The Court held that the execution court failed to issue notice to the judgment debtor before proceeding with execution, violating principles of natural justice under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC....

The petitioner, The Defense Estate Officer, Karnataka and Goa Circle, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the order dated 02.09.2022 passed i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Partition Suit — Liberal Approach to Amendment Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. The court set aside the trial court's rejection of amendment application, holding that amendments should be liberally allowed to determine the real controversy....

The petitioners, who are defendants in a partition suit (O.S. No. 3/2021) pending before the Senior Civil Judge at Ankola, filed an application (I.A. No. XIII) under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Patent Illegality. Denial of opportunity to cross-examine key witness and failure to consider crucial evidence renders award liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The dispute arose out of a contract between Unique Integrated Transport And Management Consultancies Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner) and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (respondent) for transportation services....