Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Ownership Dispute Over Suit Premises Upholding Single Judge Decree. Court found Appellants relied on forged birth certificate and tampered ration card to claim identity as 'Pushpa S. Sharma', thus affirming decree declaring original plaintiff as owner and directing possession and mesne profits....

The matter arose from an appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court against an order and judgment dated 7 August 2015, by which a Single Judge decreed Suit No. 1342 of 2003. The dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Co-Owners. Agreement for Sale of Undivided Share by One Co-Owner Does Not Create a Right to Injunction Against Other Co-Owners Who Are Not Parties to the Agreement....

The appellant-plaintiff, M/s. Amoda Properties LLP, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 21st December 2016, whereby defendant no.1, Joy Mrinalkani Basu, agreed to sell 10 acres...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction Against Demolition of Suit Structure in Municipal Corporation Dispute. Court Restrains Corporation from Demolishing Alleged Unauthorised Construction Pending Suit, Holding That Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Favour Plaintiffs....

The case involves two appeals filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (defendant no.1) and M/s. Chhaya Construction Company (defendant no.4) against an interim order dated 29th July 2021 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Nominated Councillor as Leader of House in Pune Municipal Corporation. Section 19-1A of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 Does Not Require Leader to Be Elected Councillor; Term 'Councillor' Includes Nominated Members....

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the appointment of a nominated Councillor as Leader of the House in the Pune Municipal Corporation. The petitioner, an elected Councillor, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Error in Multiplier Application — Compensation Enhanced. The Court corrected the multiplier from 12 to 13 based on the deceased's age of 45 years under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and enhanced interest rate to 7.5% per annum....

The appellants, legal heirs of the deceased Arunkumar Pandya, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for his death in a motor vehicle accident. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Multiplier Method Applied for Permanent Disability. Claimant with 20% disability awarded Rs. 1,51,140/- with interest at 6% per annum under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appellant, Snehalata Wd/o Arunkumar Pandya, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a motor accident on 26/03/1993....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Public Interest Litigation Challenging Lavasa Hill Station Project and Statutory Approvals. Petition Raises Issues of Compliance with Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Special Regulations for Hill Station Development, and Approval of Water Weirs on Varasgaon Dam Backwaters....

The judgment under consideration stems from a Public Interest Litigation filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The petitioner, a legal practitioner, invoked the court's PIL jurisdiction...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Declare Suit Non-Commercial in Specific Performance Dispute. Dispute over permanent alternate accommodation agreements held to be commercial under Section 2(1)(c) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015....

The plaintiff, Sanghvi Premises Pvt. Ltd., filed a Commercial Suit No. 181 of 2018 seeking specific performance of permanent alternate accommodation agreements and/or agreement contained in consent, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand for ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Raju @ Rakesh Dhaniram Patel, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for offences punishable under Section 364-A (kidnapping for ransom) and Section 363 (kidnapping) of ...