Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Challenging Eviction Decree on Ground of Bonafide Need Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Concurrent findings of bonafide need of landlords' sons for business upheld as not perverse....

The petitioners, tenants of a commercial premises, challenged concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court and the Appellate Court under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Rent Default Case — Eviction Decree Restored. Tenant's failure to pay rent for over six months constitutes wilful default under Section 22(2)(a) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968....

The petitioners, landlords of a commercial premises, sought eviction of the respondent tenant on the ground of default in payment of rent under Section 22(2)(a) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376D IPC and SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of three accused persons under Section 376D of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 3(2)(v) read with Section 6 of the Scheduled Caste and Sche...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Unilateral Appointment Clause Not Barred as Respondent Failed to Respond to Invocation Notice....

The petitioner, Uttam Energy Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitral tribunal to adjudicate disputes arising under two...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes National Commission for Scheduled Castes Order in Service Dispute — Commission Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reopening Concluded Disciplinary Matter. The Court held that the Commission cannot act as an appellate authority over finalised disciplinary proceedings and that its recommendations are not binding on the employer....

The Union of India and others filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 2nd March 2022 and observations dated 10th March 2022 passed by the Nation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Executing Court's Rejection of Execution Application for Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Section 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Does Not Require Separate Application Under Section 34 for Execution of Arbitral Award....

The petitioner, Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited, obtained an arbitral award on 09.04.2014 directing the respondents to pay Rs. 74,094/- with interest at 9% per annum from 03.02.2014 till 31....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Appellants Not Liable as Deceased Was the Rider, Not Pillion. The court held that the owner and driver of the motorcycle are not liable for compensation when the deceased himself was driving the vehicle and no negligence was proved against the appellants....

The present appeal was filed by the appellants challenging the judgment and award passed by the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur in Claim Petition No. 449/1995 dated 29th June 2007. By...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Removal of Trustees Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act — Proceedings Against Deceased Persons Renders Order Illegal. The court held that continuing proceedings against dead persons violates natural justice and the order is per se illegal....

The present appeal was filed by Dr. Avinash Dekate and Venimadhav Akolkar challenging the order dated 15/12/2018 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur in Application No.17/2006 under Sectio...