All Blogs

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows Appeal by GSRTC and Dismisses Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Case - Negligence of ST Bus Driver Established, Compensation Reduced for Contributory Negligence. The court apportioned negligence at 70:30 ratio between the ST bus driver and the deceased driver of the Ambassador car under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 28.06.2000 at around 2:00 a.m. when the deceased, Maheshbhai Rana, was driving his Ambassador car from Vadodara to Nadiad with passengers. An ST ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Sections 302, 326, 394, 201, 120(B) IPC and Section 135 Gujarat Police Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellant, Parulben Mahendrabhai Godani, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Surat in Sessions Case No. 150/2016 for the murder of her sister-in-law, Reshma Devendrabhai Godani...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved. Acquittal of Public Servant Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Upheld Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration....

The State of Gujarat appealed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 29-10-2010 passed by the learned Special Judge, Kachchh @ Bhuj in Special (ACB) Case No. 121 of 1994, whereby the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application by Superintending Archaeologist in Land Acquisition Appeal. Delay of 718 days not sufficiently explained; mere administrative procedure not a valid ground for condonation....

The present application was filed by the Superintending Archaeologist seeking condonation of 718 days delay in filing the First Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2023 passed by the le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Partly Allows Husband's Revision Petition in Maintenance Case Under Family Courts Act and CrPC -- Maintenance Reduced from Rs.4,000 to Rs.2,500 Per Month Due to Husband's Financial Constraints and Responsibilities Towards Daughter and Parents...

The High Court of Karnataka heard a revision petition filed by the husband against a Family Court order awarding Rs.4,000 per month as maintenance to his wife under Section 125 CrPC. The husband argue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Challenge Land Acquisition After Preliminary Notification – Karnataka High Court | Arkavathi Layout Case...

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order/report dated 23.02.2023 passed by the Justice K.N. Keshavanarayana Committee in KNKC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Industrial Dispute -- Res Judicata Bars Re-examination of Domestic Enquiry Fairness Under Industrial Disputes Act...

The Writ Appeal was filed by the appellant-Union against the dismissal of their writ petition by the Single Judge, which upheld the Labour Court's decision that the fairness of domestic enquiry was re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court on Section 77A of Karnataka Land Reforms Act: Subsequent RTC Entries Cannot Prove Cultivation on 1 March 1974...

The High Court of Karnataka allowed a writ appeal challenging the order of the learned Single Judge, who had granted respondent No.1 a one-half share in land bearing Survey No.15/2B under Section 77A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes DRAT Order Imposing Pre-deposit on Tenant Under SARFAESI Act -- Petitioner, Neither Borrower Nor Guarantor, Not Required to Deposit 40% for Appeal -- Appeal Revived and Restored for Merits Consideration Without Pre-deposit...

The Petitioner, a tenant in a redeveloped building, challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (DRAT, Mumbai) that required him to deposit 40% of the amount claimed by the Ban...