Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Demolition Order Under Section 95 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 — Lack of Jurisdiction as Dispute Involves Title and Possession. Tahsildar cannot exercise summary powers under Section 95 when there is a bona fide dispute regarding title and possession of land, which must be adjudicated by a Civil Court....

The petitioner, G.S. Siddaraju, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 05.07.2016 passed by the Tahsildar, Davangere, under Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. By that order,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Non-Payment of Court Fee - Remands for Fresh Consideration on Valuation Issue. The court upheld the remand order of the lower appellate court, directing the trial court to decide the preliminary issue regarding valuation and court fee afresh after hearing both sides....

The respondents (plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and perpetual injunction in respect of plaint schedule property. The appellants (defendants) contested the suit. Issue No.3 regarding...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Panchayat Officers for Non-Compliance of Interim Order in Service Matter. Willful Disobedience Not Established as Orders Were Not Clear and Specific Regarding Payment of Salary....

The complainants, including a union and several individuals, filed contempt petitions under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of an interim order dated 20.12.2013 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Dismiss Suit for Specific Performance Based on Unregistered Agreement of Sale. Agreement of Sale Not Requiring Compulsory Registration Under Registration Act, 1908 as It Does Not Transfer Any Right, Title or Interest....

The respondent/plaintiff instituted O.S. No.67/2013 in the Court of Civil Judge, Muddebihal, seeking specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 09.02.1998 and a direction to the defendant to e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 as Ultra Vires Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act. Rule restricting transfer of mining leases to minerals not specified in First Schedule held inconsistent with parent Act....

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the validity of Rule 8(1)(a) of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016, to the extent it ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 by Mining Lessees. Rule requiring prior approval for transfer of mining leases for minerals not in First Schedule to MMDR Act held intra vires and not inconsistent with Section 10A(2)(c) of Amendment Act 2015....

The petitioners, holders of mining leases for minerals not specified in the First Schedule to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR Act), challenged the validity of Rule ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice Against Grama Panchayat Member for Alleged Irregularity in Sanctioning Construction During Previous Term. Notice Issued After Five-Year Gap Held Unreasonable and Barred by Delay and Laches Under Section 43A of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993....

The petitioner, B.N. Krupananda, a member of Basavanahalli Grama Panchayat, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of show cause notices dated 0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BESCOM Demand Notices for Alleged Theft of Electricity Due to Lack of Evidence of Tampering. Meter found to be in working condition and no pilferage detected, demand set aside as arbitrary....

The petitioner, Vishwas Concrete Products Private Limited, is a company engaged in the business of running a concrete mixing industrial unit. It had two electricity connections with BESCOM. BESCOM iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Apartment Construction in Residential Zone. Petitioners failed to prove zoning violation or need for environmental clearance; BBMP's approval upheld....

The petitioners, Sri. V. Dhamodaran and others, residents of Kaikondarahalli, Bangalore, filed writ petitions challenging the construction of an apartment complex by the respondents, including Bruhat ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Upa-Lokayukta Recommendation in Disciplinary Matter — Procedural Fairness Required When Disagreeing with Inquiry Officer. Upa-lokayukta cannot disagree with inquiry officer's findings without providing opportunity of hearing; disciplinary authority must follow natural justice before differing from inquiry officer or Upa-lokayukta....

The petitioner, Sri Shankarappa, an employee of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL), challenged the recommendation dated 16.01.2015 made by the Upa-lokayukta under Regulation 14(A...