Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Operate S.T. Canteen During Night Hours Despite Police Restrictions. Exemption under Maharashtra Shops and Establishment Act and Bombay Police Act, 1951 permits 24-hour operation of canteen at bus stand....

The petitioner, Ram Baburao Haral, operates a canteen at the S.T. bus stand in Beed, Maharashtra, under a valid license granted by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC). The canteen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Externment Order for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind — Petitioner Externed Under Section 56(1)(a) & (b) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Based on Stale and Unrelated Crimes....

The petitioner, Bhushan Pohokar, challenged the externment order dated 13.05.2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-1, Amravati, under Section 56(1)(a) & (b) of the Maharashtra Police ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Section 264 Application in Income Tax Case — Holds Section 179(1) Order Against Legal Heirs Requires Proper Application of Mind. Revisional Authority Must Consider Merits and Not Reject Application Mechanically Under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961....

The petitioners, Manjula D. Rita and Bhavya D. Rita, are two of the four legal heirs of the deceased Dinesh Shamji Rita, who was a director of a company. They filed a writ petition before the Bombay H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Judgment in Commercial Suit for Unpaid Rent, Grants Unconditional Leave to Defend. Triable issues raised regarding termination of lease and liability of partners under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932....

The plaintiff, PVR Ltd., filed a Commercial Summary Suit against the defendants, Proetus Ventures LLP and its partners, Shardul Bayas and Abhinay Ramesh Deo, for recovery of unpaid rent and mesne prof...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative of deceased and testimony was inconsistent with medical evidence....

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the appellants challenging their conviction under Sections 302, 307, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of one ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and lack of corroboration....

The appellants, Gulab, Sunil, Kamal, Amol, and Durgabai, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana in Sessions Case No.65/2017. Gulab and Sunil were convicted under Section 302 read wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Naresh Shriram Uikey, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of Sumitra Tanuji Uikey under Section 302 IPC and for wrongful restraint under Section 341 IPC, and sentenced to li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction on Communidade Land in Ribandar-Chimbel Area — Holds That Petitioners Failed to Establish Encroachment on Public Property or Violation of CRZ Norms. The court found that the petitioner society lacked locus standi and the construction permissions were validly granted....

The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Ribandar Chimbel Rakhon Samiti, a registered society, challenging construction activities on land in the Ribandar-Chimbel area of G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Forest Department Transit Fee on Imported Timber. Imported timber from foreign country is not 'forest produce' under Maharashtra Forest Rules, 1970, and no transit fee can be levied for its transportation from port to customs CFS....

The petitioner, Omprakash Nagoja, a sole proprietor of O.P.M. International, imported timber from a foreign country. The timber arrived at Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT) at Navasheva, Uran, Distri...