Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit for Recovery of $300,000 in Commercial Contract Dispute. Zee Entertainment's claim for payment under a content licensing agreement upheld against Triller Inc for failure to make payment despite repeated demands....

The plaintiff, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited, a public listed company, filed a summary suit in the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Court against Triller Inc, a company incorporated in t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging CAT Order Denying Promotion from 2010. Petitioner's claim for promotion from 22 November 2010 rejected as he was not eligible on that date....

The petitioner, Chandrakant C. Mishra, a Tax Assistant (Group C) aged 61, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mumbai,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating 'Bhat' OBC Claim — Single Inconsistent Entry in School Record Not Sufficient to Disprove Consistent Ancestral Entries and Favorable Vigilance Report....

The petitioner, Nilesh Ramesh Vyas, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Yavatmal, which invalidated his claim of belonging to the 'Bhat' c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Sopan s/o Kadu Choudhari, a Police Inspector, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadchiroli for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The prose...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Where Relationship Was Consensual and No False Promise of Marriage — Ingredients of Section 375 IPC Not Made Out. The Court held that a mere breach of promise does not constitute rape under Section 376 IPC if the promise was not false from the inception....

The petitioner, Mahendra Ladu Sawant, was an accused in FIR No.151/2018 lodged on 01/11/2018 under Section 376 IPC (rape) based on a complaint by respondent No.3, Dipashree Walawalkar. The petitioner ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in RAE Suit — Tenant's Legal Representatives Cannot Challenge Landlord's Title After Attornment. Consent Decree in Partition Suit Binding on Parties; Tenant Cannot Deny Landlord's Title Under Section 116 of Evidence Act, 1872....

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the defendants (legal representatives of the original tenant) against the judgment and decree of eviction passed by the Small Causes Court, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tax Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Upholds Addition of Unexplained Cash Credits Under Section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness of Share Application Money Leads to Confirmation of Addition....

The case involves a tax appeal by M/s. Prithvi Consultants Pvt. Ltd. against the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Panaji, Goa. The dispute arose from the assessment year 2008-09, whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasons and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the Assessing Officer failed to provide recorded reasons to the assessee and did not apply his mind to the fact that the transaction was already disclosed and examined during the original assessment under Section 143(3)....

The petitioner, Ashraf Chitalwala, an individual resident of India, filed his original return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 on 27th September 2015 and a revised return on 7th December 2015. A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Amenity Space Computation Dispute — D.P. Road Area Must Be Adjusted Against Total Amenity Space Under DCR 57(4)(c)(ii). The court held that the Municipal Corporation's refusal to sanction plans based on a misinterpretation of DCR 57(4)(c)(ii) and Note II was arbitrary and unsustainable....

The petitioner, Atul Projects India Pvt Ltd, a developer, owned a plot of land in Mumbai and submitted development plans to the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) for sanction. The MCGM re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of GSTIN in Bill of Entry Under Section 149 of Customs Act, 1962 — Petitioner's Request for Correction of GSTIN and Address in Bill of Entry Allowed as Permissible Amendment...

The petitioner, Sinochem India Company Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated October 29, 2021 passed by the Assistant Commissioner ...