Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Exemption Case — Tribunal's Remand Order Upheld. Commissioner's Rejection of Registration Under Section 12AA of Income Tax Act, 1961 Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind....

The Revenue, Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Davanagere, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Exemption Case — Tribunal's Remand Order Upheld. Commissioner's Rejection of Registration Under Section 12AA of Income Tax Act, 1961 Set Aside for Lack of Proper Inquiry....

The Revenue, Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Davanagere, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), 'C' Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Debarment of Retired CCI Officials from Legal Practice. Petition lacks bonafide public interest and is motivated by personal vendetta....

The petitioner, Dr. Savio Pereira, filed a writ petition purportedly as a public interest litigation before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The petition sought directions to the Competition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Debarment of Retired CCI Officials from Legal Practice — No Cause of Action or Public Interest Established. Petition fails to demonstrate any legal right or public injury warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioner, Dr. Savio Pereira, filed a writ petition purportedly as a public interest litigation before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The petition sought directions to the Competition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Motor Vehicle Accident Cases — Tribunal Erred in Returning Claim Petitions for Lack of Jurisdiction. Jurisdiction under Section 166(2) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is determined by claimant's choice of place of residence or business, not by accident location....

The judgment pertains to two Miscellaneous First Appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 10.07.2013 passed in MVC No.2118/2012 and MVC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. Computation of Future Prospects and Deduction for Personal Expenses Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Deceased was a bachelor aged 24 years, 50% future prospects added, 50% deduction for personal expenses applied....

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimants, family members of the deceased Y. Manjunath, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. Computation of Loss of Dependency Based on Notional Income of Rs.9,000 per Month for a Vegetable Vendor with Addition of 40% Towards Future Prospects and Deduction of 1/4th Towards Personal Expenses....

The judgment pertains to two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimants, being the widow, children, and parents of the deceased Yellappa, sought enhancement of compensation awarded by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Allowing Complainant to Lead Further Evidence After Accused's Evidence in Private Complaint. Section 246 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Re-examination of Complainant After Accused's Evidence....

The case involves a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner (accused No.1) against the respondent (complainant). The respondent had filed a private complaint under Section ...