Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator Due to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in Work Order vesting jurisdiction in Delhi courts ousts jurisdiction of Karnataka High Court under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The petitioner, Polybond Organics Private Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising out of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Minor with 90% Disability in Motor Accident Case — Rs. 16,50,000 Increased to Rs. 25,00,000 with 6% Interest. Loss of future prospects and attendant charges awarded for minor victim with amputation of both legs....

The appellant, Kumari Laxmi, a minor aged 2 years, suffered severe injuries in a motor accident, resulting in amputation of her left leg above the knee and right foot, leading to 90% permanent disabil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Order for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Serve Section 4(1) Notice and Conduct Section 5-A Inquiry Renders Acquisition Proceedings Invalid....

The petitioner, Yusuf Ali S/o Khader Shah Faqeer, is the legal heir of the original petitioner Khadarsha Faqeer. The original petitioner had filed W.P.No.9052/2006 seeking implementation of an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition and Sets Aside Trial Court Order Rejecting Application Under Section 8 of Arbitration Act — Dispute Referred to Arbitration. Agreement Containing Arbitration Clause Not Properly Stamped Does Not Bar Reference Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The petitioners, Transvahan Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director S.R. Venkatesan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 29....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Alleging Smuggling of Sensitive Materials During Aero India Shows for Lack of Credible Material and Public Interest. The Court held that a Public Interest Litigation must be based on bonafide intentions and concrete evidence, not on vague allegations or newspaper reports, and dismissed the petition as an abuse of process....

The petitioners, Nishchal Padhya and Arun Goyal, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. They alleged t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking Records of Import of Ground Handling Equipment During Aero India Shows. Petitioners failed to establish any specific instance of smuggling or violation of law, and the petition was found to be based on vague allegations and unsubstantiated claims....

The petitioners, Nishchal Padhya and Arun Goyal, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. They sought a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Criminal Revision Petition in Maintenance Case Under Section 125 CrPC — Petitioner Fails to Prove Entitlement to Enhanced Maintenance. The court held that the trial court's order granting maintenance at Rs. 2,000 per month was not perverse or illegal, and the revision petition lacked merit....

The petitioner, Mrs. Neelam Manmohan, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the order dated 30.07.2015 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Maintenance Case Under Section 125 CrPC — Petitioner Fails to Show Illegality or Irregularity in Trial Court Order. The revisional court cannot interfere with a well-reasoned order of maintenance unless it is perverse or illegal....

The petitioner, Mrs. Neelam Manmohan, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the order dated 30.07.2015 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Discharges Accused in Corruption Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Sanction for prosecution is mandatory and without it, the accused cannot be tried....

The petitioner, an accused in Spl.C.C.No.266/2016 before the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, filed an application under Section 227 read with Section 239 Cr.P.C. seeking di...