Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In

Karnataka High Court

Home Karnataka High Court
Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Delivers Common Order in Writ Petitions on Disciplinary Enquiry Against Assistant Public Prosecutors. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution Challenging KSAT Orders Which Upheld Lokayukta's Enquiry Under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957....

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed by Assistant Public Prosecutors-cum-Assistant Government Pleaders under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners challenged ...

By Admin
  • 150
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under PITNDPS Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Proximate Link. Detention order set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's pending bail application and the order was passed mechanically without proper application of mind....

The petitioner, Mr. Kenneth Jideofor, challenged a preventive detention order dated 23.01.2020 passed by the Joint Secretary to the Government of India under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit ...

By Admin
  • 119
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court Considers Quo Warranto Petition Alleging Illegal Appointment Against Non-Notified BCT Post in KIADB. Petition Argues That Appointment in Contravention of Advertised Reservation Is Void Ab Initio Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution....

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a registered society representing Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe, and Backward Class employees, challenging the appointm...

By Admin
  • 86
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A MV Act — No Defence of Contributory Negligence Available. The Court held that under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the defence of contributory negligence is not available to the insurer and the Tribunal's award based on the structured formula cannot be interfered with....

The appellant, IFFCO-TOKIO GIC Ltd., an insurance company, filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 20.06.2013 passed by the Principal...

By Admin
  • 195
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Landlord's Revision Petitions in Rent Control Case — Bona Fide Requirement for Demolition Not Established. Concurrent findings of fact by courts below upheld as not perverse under Section 115 CPC....

The petitioner, Smt. M. Sharada, filed two revision petitions under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging a common order dated 10.02.2011 passed by the I Additional District Ju...

By Admin
  • 115
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A MV Act — No Defence of Contributory Negligence Available in Structured Formula Claims. Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Alleged Negligence of Deceased as Section 163A is a No-Fault Liability Scheme....

The appeal arises out of a judgment and award dated 20.06.2013 in M.V.C.No.301/2011 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge & M.A.C.T., Puttur, D.K. The appellant, IFFCO-TOKIO GIC Ltd., is the insu...

By Admin
  • 140
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Tenant's Revision Petitions in Rent Control Matter — Landlord's Bona Fide Requirement for Demolition and Reconstruction Established. Revisional Court's Order Confirmed as Landlord Proved Reasonable and Bona Fide Need Under Section 21(1)(h) of Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961....

The petitioner, Smt. M. Sharada, filed two revision petitions under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging a common order dated 10.02.2011 passed by the I Additional District Ju...

By Admin
  • 94
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Long Incarceration. Petitioners/Accused Nos. 5 and 6 in Crime No.214/2019 for offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307 r/w 149 IPC granted regular bail under Section 439 CrPC....

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru disposed of two connected criminal petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking regular bail. The petitioners, Syed...

By Admin
  • 159
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Long Incarceration. Petitioners/Accused Nos.5 and 6 Granted Regular Bail Under Section 439 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307 r/w 149 IPC....

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, presided by Justice K. Somashekar, disposed of two connected criminal petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking...

By Admin
  • 140
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench adjudicates multiple appeals and cross-objections under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, concerning compensation for lands acquired for a minor irrigation tank in Kakhandaki Village. The dispute involves the correct determination of market value following the Reference Court's enhancement from the initial awards of the Land Acquisition Officer....

These appeals under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and cross-objections under Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arise from a common judgment of the Reference Cou...

By Admin
  • 30
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition natural justice murder acquittal Compensation burden of proof limitation land acquisition Article 226 jurisdiction
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court Upholds State's Authority to Charge Transfer Premium in Liquidation Proceedings...

High Court Dismisses Application Challenging Order for Data Extraction from Mobile Phone i...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Temple Property Gift — Affirms State's Cust...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Charge Framing in Corruption Case — Upholds High ...

Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Deputy Registrar in University Disciplinary Proceedings D...

Lost Your Password?