Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay, Non-Consideration of Bail Order, and Violation of Article 22(5). Detaining Authority Failed to Communicate Representation Decision and Consider Bail Order; Violated Petitioner's Constitutional Right....

The case pertained to a writ of habeas corpus filed by the detenu challenging a preventive detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords Bootleggers, Drug-Offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Public Order Impact — Single Criminal Case and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Establish Detriment to Public Order....

The petitioner, Nilesh Sunil Pendulkar, challenged an order dated 06.10.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahmednagar, under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Doctor's Petition for Relaxation of Bail Conditions — Implied Power Under Section 439(1)(b) CrPC Recognized. Trial Court erred in holding it had no power to modify bail conditions; the power to grant bail includes the power to modify conditions....

The petitioner, Dr. Rajaram Dhondiba Shendge, a doctor by profession, was granted bail in R.C.C. No.22 of 2022 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Omerga, subject to certain conditions...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Relaxation of Bail Conditions in Criminal Case — Implied Power Under Section 439(1)(b) CrPC Recognized. Court holds that a trial court has inherent power to modify or relax bail conditions even if not expressly stated, as the power to grant bail includes the power to alter its terms....

The petitioner, Dr. Rajaram Dhondiba Shendge, was an accused in R.C.C. No.22 of 2022 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Omerga. He had been granted bail subject to certain conditions,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Rape of Minor Daughter Under POCSO Act — Sole Testimony of Victim Sufficient. The court held that the victim's credible testimony, corroborated by age proof and medical evidence, established the offence of aggravated penetrative sexual assault under Section 6 of the POCSO Act....

The appellant, Ganpati Shankar Kage, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga in Special Case No.18 of 2021 for offences under Sections 376, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Rape of Minor Daughter Under POCSO Act — Sole Testimony of Victim Sufficient. Conviction under Sections 376, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 6, 8, 12 of POCSO Act upheld based on credible testimony of minor victim and corroborative medical and age evidence....

The appellant, Ganpati Shankar Kage, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga, in Special Case No.18 of 2021 for offences under Sections 376, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Assistant Engineers Seeking Employment with MSEB Holding Co. Ltd. — Directs Consideration of Candidature for Vacant Posts. The court held that selected candidates have a right to be considered for appointment against available vacancies, and the respondents cannot arbitrarily deny appointment....

The petitioners, nine individuals who were selected as Assistant Engineers by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) Holding Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking employment. They had been s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation — Income Tax Act, 1961 Sections 147, 148, 148A, 149, 151. Reassessment notice issued beyond limitation period and without fresh information under Explanation 1 to Section 148 is invalid....

The petitioner, Godrej Industries Ltd., challenged a show cause notice dated 24th May 2022 under Section 148A(b), an order dated 31st July 2022 under Section 148A(d), and a notice dated 31st July 2022...