Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Adyaksha and Upadyaksha — Motion Valid Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 as No Prior Notice Required for Special Meeting Convened by Prescribed Authority...

The petitioners, who are members of Somaguddi Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Adyaksha (C.L. Satish Babu) and Upadyaksha (Yashodamma) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Landowners' Petition Declaring Acquisition Lapsed Under BDA Act and RFCTLARR Act. Acquisition Initiated in 1988 and Finalized in 1994 Lapsed as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Within Five Years Under Section 27 of BDA Act, 1976 and Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013....

The petitioners, Sri M Nagesh Reddy, Smt M Sathya Reddy, and Sri M Devendra, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengalu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Under SC/ST Act — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out Against Accused Nos. 2 and 3. Court found that the role attributed to petitioners was not specific and they were not named in the FIR, leading to grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C....

The petitioners, Sri Umesh and Sri Hanumantharayappa, accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Spl.C.C.No.213/2019 pending before the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, filed a crimin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Withdrawn in Tender Matter — Petitioners Seek Participation in Tender Process but Counsel Does Not Press Petition. Petitioners' counsel submitted that he does not press the petition and undertook to send a memo for withdrawal; court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without adjudicating on merits....

The petitioners, three concrete products firms, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the respondent, the Managing Director of MESCOM, to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs BBMP to Consider Representation Against Illegal Dispossession — Petitioners Seek Protection of Possession Over Schedule Property. Court Orders Respondent No.2 to Consider Representation Dated 06.02.2020 and Pass Orders Within Four Weeks....

The petitioners, K.M. Sadiq and Rafi Ulla, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. They sought to restrain the re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition as Withdrawn in Quashing Proceedings Case Under Section 482 CrPC. Petitioners sought to quash proceedings in C.C.No.5488/2015 but withdrew the petition during hearing....

The petitioners, M/s. RA Powergen Engineers Pvt. Ltd., its Managing Director S.N. Suryameendra, and Director Smt. Vani, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.5 in Murder Case on Parity with Co-Accused Who Were Not Assailants. The Court held that since the petitioner's role of providing protection was identical to that of co-accused Nos.6 and 7 who were granted bail, the petitioner was entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC....

The petitioner, Abhishek @ Abhi, accused No.5 in Crime No.172/2019 registered at Ulsoor Police Station, Bengaluru, for offences punishable under Sections 302, 120-B read with Section 34 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Revenue Officials for Alleged Disobedience of Writ Direction. Direction to Consider Representation Does Not Amount to Specific Order to Mutate Land, No Wilful Disobedience Under Sections 11 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971....

The complainants, eight individuals claiming to be owners of land in Yelahanka Taluk, filed a contempt petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging that the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR and Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice — Complaint Filed Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Fails as Notice Was Not Sent to Correct Address of Accused....

The petitioners, Sri N. Subramani and Sri Vishwanath N., filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of the proceedings in PCR No.1936/2014 pe...