Karnataka High Court

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credibl...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's De...

Karnataka High Court

Home Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes DV Act Complaint Against In-Laws for Lack of Domestic Relationship. Petition under Section 482 CrPC allowed as petitioners, being relatives of husband, did not share a 'domestic relationship' with the complainant under Section 2(f) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005....

The petitioners, who are the father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law, and sister-in-law of the respondent-complainant, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Dishonour of Cheque Due to Insufficient Funds. Conviction Set Aside as Complainant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881....

The revision petition was filed by Smt. Gouri, the accused, challenging her conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant, Devan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Restores Suit Dismissed as Withdrawn Without Consent of All Plaintiffs in Representative Suit Under Order I Rule 8 CPC. Suit filed under Order I Rule 8 CPC cannot be withdrawn by some plaintiffs without consent of all and without court permission....

The petitioners, original plaintiffs No.5, 7, and 9, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the order dated 09.11.2020 passed by the P...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Considers Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction, Frames Substantial Questions of Law Regarding Pleadings and Title Dispute...

This Regular Second Appeal arose out of an original suit for permanent injunction in a property dispute. The plaintiff claimed ownership and possession of the suit property and sought to restrain the ...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366 and 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellant, Obalesha @ Ranga, was convicted by the Fast Track Sessions Court-XVI, Bangalore City, in S.C.No.305/2011 for offences under Sections 366 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The pros...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition by Unincorporated Association Challenging Rejection of Reservation Recommendation. Court holds that an unincorporated association lacks locus standi to seek enforcement of reservation benefits under the Karnataka State Backward Classes Commission Act, 1995....

The petitioner, Codava National Council, an unincorporated association of individuals belonging to the Kodava community of Coorg, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 448 and 323 IPC — Benefit of Doubt Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. The court found the victim's testimony unreliable and the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Nagashetty, was convicted by the Fast Track Court-III at Mysore in S.C.No.237/2010 for offences under Sections 448 (criminal trespass) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) of the Indian P...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Endorsement Denying Khata Transfer in Land Conversion Dispute — Municipal Authority Cannot Refuse Khata Transfer Based on Revenue Entries Alone Without Considering Conversion Order. The court held that once conversion under Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 is granted, the municipal authority must consider the application for khata transfer in accordance with the conversion, and cannot reject it solely on the ground that revenue records still show the land as agricultural....

The petitioners, Smt. Prabhavathi M.S. and Dr. Subramanya P.S., are the wife and son of late P.S. Srinivasamurthy, residents of Periyapatna Town. They own land in Sy.No.322/1 of Periyapatna Town, whic...

High Court