Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition by Defendants in Suit for Declaration and Injunction, Quashing Trial Court Order to Decide Valuation and Court Fee as Preliminary Issue. Held that issues relating to valuation and court fee are mixed questions of law and fact and must be decided at final stage under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC....

The petitioners, who were defendants No.5 and 6 in a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the respondents (plaintiffs), challenged an order dated 13.06.2019 passed by the Senior Civil Judge an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Legality of Arrests by Enforcement Directorate in Money Laundering Case After Predicate Offence Closed. Petitioners Allege Violation of Section 19 of PMLA and Fundamental Rights, Challenging Custody Remand Orders....

The three writ petitions, heard together, challenged the legality of the arrest and subsequent custody remand orders of the petitioners, who were directors and office bearers of M/s Games Kraft Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Appeal in Hindu Succession Act Case — Daughter Entitled to Equal Share in Joint Family Property. Daughter's right to partition of ancestral property upheld under Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as amended in 2005, despite father's death during pendency of suit....

The appellant, Smt. Usha N Swamy, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 13.04.2018 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Payment of Provident Fund Dues from Bank Sale Proceeds. Section 11(2) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 creates a first charge over assets of the establishment, overriding the claims of a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act....

The petitioner, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained....

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) scheme in Bengaluru. The Writ Appeal and connected w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Specific Performance Denied....

The case involved two second appeals concerning a property dispute over an agreement of sale dated 11.07.1999 for land in Huskur Village. The appellant, Mr. V. Chandrashekar, sought specific performan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Bank's Claim in Forward Purchase Contracts Dispute Due to Lack of Evidence. Bank's Failure to Produce Essential Documents Results in Dismissal of Claims Regarding Disputed FPCs....

The dispute involved three writ petitions concerning claims made by Canara Bank regarding 48 Forward Purchase Contracts (FPCs) allegedly booked by Texport Overseas Pvt. Ltd. and its associated entitie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Upholds Lower Court's Findings....

The case involved multiple regular second appeals concerning a property dispute over agricultural land in Chikkaballapura. The appellants, who were the purchasers of the land, challenged the judgments...