All Blogs

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Unconditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit Under Order 37 CPC — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Loan Repayment and Promissory Note Execution. The court set aside the trial court's conditional leave order requiring 50% deposit, holding that the defendants raised substantial triable issues under Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC....

The case arises from a summary suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff, A. Kanagarajan, against the petitioners/defendants, M/s. Sri MVR Logistics Private Limited and its directors, for recovery of Rs....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case on Parity with Co-Accused Released by Supreme Court Due to Trial Delay. Petitioner Granted Bail Under Section 37 of NDPS Act Considering Long Incarceration and Non-Compliance of Trial Completion Direction....

The petitioner, Jasheer Razak (A2), was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.01.2023 in connection with C.C.No.971 of 2023 for offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c), 23, 28, and 29(1) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Substantial Compliance in Water Body Encroachment Case. Court Directs Cancellation of 1969 Assignment Before Removal of Remaining Encroachment....

The contempt petition was filed by A. Arumugam under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 06.06.2025 passed by the Madras High Court in W.P....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Provisional Attachment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Attachment of Bank Accounts and Property Without Prior Hearing Held Invalid Under Section 79(1)(c) of CGST Act, 2017....

The petitioner, Navin Vishwanathan, proprietor of M/s. Oriental Facility, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 300A of the Constitution of India challenging a communication dated 21st March 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition and Quashes Penalty Orders Against Farmer in Revenue Dispute Due to Procedural Irregularities and Violation of Natural Justice. Revenue Authorities Imposed Penalty for Alleged Illegal Sand Excavation Based on Contradictory Evidence and Without Proper Inquiry or Hearing, Violating Due Process Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code....

The dispute involved a 75-year-old farmer challenging penalty orders imposed by revenue authorities for alleged illegal sand excavation from his agricultural land. The petitioner owned Gat No. 208 in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Gambling Offences Due to Lack of Public Order Threat. Detention Based Solely on Gambling Crimes Under Maharashtra Gambling Act Fails as Isolated Incidents Do Not Disturb Community Tempo Under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act, 1981....

The dispute involved a challenge to a preventive detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. The petitioner, alleged to be a dangerous person, was detained base...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Partly Allows Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Pension Calculation for Daily Wager Employees. Daily Wager Service Prior to Regularization Does Not Qualify as Pensionable Service Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as Appointments Were Not Against Sanctioned Posts....

The dispute involved Nagpur Municipal Corporation challenging an Industrial Court order that granted pensionary benefits to daily wager employees by counting their contractual service prior to regular...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Liability for Interest on Arbitral Award Deposit — Clarifies Legal Principles on Conditional Deposits....

The dispute arose from an arbitral award dated 13.06.2019 against the appellant for Rs. 1,46,40,005.02, with interest at 12% per annum. The appellant challenged the award under Section 34 of the Arbit...