Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Critical Judicial Interpretation of Balancing Legal Framework and Justice Delivery "Exploring the legal nuances and judicial reasoning in a pivotal case."...

The judgment elucidates key legal principles while addressing facts and applying relevant sections. It highlights judicial discretion, the interplay between substantive and procedural law, and equitab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Upholding Procedural Validity in SARFAESI Proceedings. "Reaffirming the ministerial role of courts under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act."...

The Bombay High Court, examined procedural aspects under the SARFAESI Act concerning the non-compliance with the requirements of Section 13(2) and Section 14. The court dismissed the writ petition cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses DRI Appeal Against Acquittal in Gold Smuggling Case — Conscious Possession Not Proved. Trial Court's acquittal upheld as prosecution failed to establish that respondent had knowledge and control over gold bars recovered from her residence....

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by the Union of India (through the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, DRI) against the acquittal of Smt. Ameenabi (Respondent No.1) by the Metropolitan M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Non-Admissible Appeal Order in MEIS Scrip Dispute. Resolving ambiguity in appeal provisions under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992....

  Maintainability of Appeal: Rejection letters from JDGFT constitute appealable decisions under Section 15. The ADGFT acted within its jurisdiction. Non-Speaking Orders: Administrative or quasi-j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Authority to Decide Advance Ruling on Merits Despite Subsequent Pre-Show Cause Notice in GST Matter. The court held that a pre-show cause notice issued after filing an advance ruling application does not bar the Authority from deciding the application under Section 98(2) of the SGST Act, as 'already pending' refers to the date of filing....

The petitioner, General Motors India Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a pre-show cause notice in Form DRC-01A issued by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax under Section 73(5) re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Manufacturer in Food Adulteration Case Due to Belated Filing After Expiry of Best Before Date. Right Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Frustrated as Complaint Filed 16 Months After Best Before Date....

The applicant, M/s Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturing company, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the order dated 24.03.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Declares Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Non-Compliance with Time Limit. Award Excluding Subject Lands and Subsequent Inaction for Over Two Decades Leads to Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings....

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Laxman Mahadev Katkar, challenged the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the Urmodi Project. The acquisition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Concurrent Findings in Tenancy Declaration Suit. Applicant fails to prove membership of deceased tenant's family or residence in suit premises under Section 7(15)(d) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999....

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Pradeep Kumar Lalit Kumar Pandya challenging the concurrent judgments of the Small Causes Court and its Appellate Bench dismissing his suit for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay HC Refuses to Quash FIR in 498-A Case, Cites Judicial Defiance and Prima Facie Evidence" “Compliance with judicial orders and allegations of cruelty under Section 498-A IPC weigh against quashing proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.”...

The Bombay High Court dismissed an application seeking quashing of FIR and criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C., citing continued non-compliance with a judicial custody order and prima facie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Airport Land Acquisition in Marol Village — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 90 per sq. m. for 1981 and 1982 Notifications. Court Relies on Expert Valuer's Report and Rejects SLAO's Low Valuation Based on Inadequate Comparable Sales....

The judgment pertains to two Land Acquisition References (LAR No.18 of 1988 and LAR No.19 of 1988) filed by A.H. Wadia Charity Trust (the Claimant) seeking enhancement of compensation for lands acquir...