Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3388 OF 2024...

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 984 of 2018...

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 16432 OF 2025...

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 119 OF 2024...

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Supplier in Arbitration Petition as MSEFC Fails to Act on Payment Claim; Section 18 of MSMED Act Creates Statutory Arbitration Agreement Justifying Section 11 Petition....

The dispute involved a supplier who had executed a purchase order dated June 8, 2018, and supplied goods to the respondent buyer. Invoices were raised but amounts remained unpaid. The supplier, being ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Maharashtra Stamp Act for Delayed Payment. Court Analyses Effect of Interim Stay on Demand Date Under Section 31(4)....

The petitioner, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging demand notices dated 23 December 2013 and 31 December 2014...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petitions Challenging Two IPL Franchise Arbitration Awards. Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Payment of Rs.384.83 Crore and Return of Rs.153.34 Crore Bank Guarantee with 18% Interest, Which the Franchisor Contested on Jurisdictional and Merits Grounds....

The dispute arose from the Indian Premier League (IPL) franchise agreements between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the Kochi franchise entities. In 2008, BCCI issued an invitatio...