Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Final Notice to Renowned Shooter for Additional Weapons License — Mandamus Issued to Consider Application Without Demanding Minimum Qualifying Marks. Arms Rules, 2016 Definition of 'Renowned Shooter' Does Not Require Disclosure of Minimum Qualifying Marks for Grant of Additional Firearms....

The petitioner, Sri K. Sajan Aiyappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging a final notice dated 28...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Endorsement on Building Construction — Petitioner Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 321 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964....

The petitioner, Shri Shrishail S/o Gangappa Bolannawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, challenging an endorseme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Non-Prosecution of Driver and Owner — Claimants Entitled to Compensation as Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Petition for Default Without Considering Merits. Dismissal for default set aside, matter remitted for fresh consideration under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appeal arises from the judgment and award dated 04.03.2010 in MVC No.395/2007 passed by the III Addl. MACT, Bagalkot, whereby the claim petition filed by the appellants (claimants) under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Appointment of Government Pleader for Non-Compliance with Statutory Rules. Appointment of Advocate as Government Pleader Set Aside for Violation of Rule 5 of Karnataka Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1977....

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Shantreddy and Savithri, both advocates and government pleaders, challenging the appointment of the 4th respondent in each case as Government Plead...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt by rash driving), and 304A (cau...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Doctors in SC/ST Atrocities Case — Allegations of Caste-Based Discrimination Found to be Vague and Lacking Specific Intent. Court holds that mere use of caste name without intent to insult does not attract provisions of SC/ST Act....

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) by Dr. Raghavendra B. Nayak and Dr. Mahesh Desai, seeking quashing of FIR in Crim...