Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Claim as Time-Barred Due to 37-Year Delay. Challenge to Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Rejected for Unexplained Laches....

The petitioners, Babasaheb Eknath Wakchaure, Sunil Namdeo Wakchaure, and Balasaheb Gangadhar Wakchaure, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) challenging an award dated 10 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Petition in Property Dispute — Appointment of Court Commissioner for Measurement Upheld. The court held that appointment of a commissioner under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC is permissible to elucidate any matter in dispute, including measurement, and the revisional court should not interfere with such discretionary orders....

The petitioner, original defendant No.1 in Special Civil Suit No.21 of 2011, challenged the order dated 2nd December 2011 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division (Corporation Court), Aurang...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintainability of Appeal by Widow Under Section 9 of MEPS Act. Widow of Dismissed Employee Can Maintain Appeal as Right Survives to Legal Representative for Service and Monetary Claims....

The petitioners, Yogeshwari Shikshan Sanstha and Swami Ramanand Tirth College, challenged an order of the School Tribunal, Aurangabad, dated 15.1.2016, which rejected their application contending that...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Summary Suit Case Due to Non-Service of Summons. Ex Parte Decree Set Aside as Trial Court Erred in Treating Application Under Order 37 Rule 4 CPC as Review....

The appellant, M/s. Shakti Bioscience Ltd., filed an appeal against an ex parte judgment and decree dated 04.11.2015 passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, in a summary suit under Order 37 Rule 2 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance — Single Criminal Case and In-camera Statements Insufficient to Justify Detention as 'Dangerous Person'...

The petitioner, Arjun Balkrishna Sonavane, challenged a preventive detention order dated 12.10.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Ad-Interim Relief in Suit Challenging BMC's Demolition Notice. Occupants of Unauthorized Structures Not Entitled to Injunction Against Statutory Authority Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888....

The appellants, occupants and owners of premises in Manish Apartment, Vile Parle, filed a suit seeking injunction against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC) from demolishing their struc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Subsistence Allowance Payment. Subsistence Allowance Payable Only During Suspension Period, Not After Dismissal Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971....

The petitioner, M/s. Pravi Auto Swing Pvt Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 21-3-2016 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court in Complaint ULP No.54 of 2005. The Industrial Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Government Resolution Requiring NOC for School Recognition in Education Act Case. Educational Societies Challenge Condition of No Objection Certificate from Local Authority for Grant of Recognition to Primary Schools Under Maharashtra Primary Education Act, 1947....

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various educational societies and trusts challenging a Government Resolution (GR) dated 30th June 2012 issued by the State of Maharashtra, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Circumstances. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellant, Limbaji s/o Ranghnath Salgar, was convicted under Section 302 IPC by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, in Sessions Case No. 83 of 2011 for the murder of his wife Laxmibai. T...