Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The case involves two appeals against conviction for murder, robbery, and causing disappearance of evidence. The deceased, Madan Phatak, went missing on 14/4/2000 after visiting Hotel Three Flight Up....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Registration of Advocates' Federation as Trade Union Under Trade Unions Act, 1926. Advocates' Association Held Eligible for Registration as Trade Union Under Section 2(h) of the Act, as Definition Does Not Require Members to Be 'Workmen' Under Industrial Disputes Act....

The petitioner, I. A. Saiyed, a practicing advocate registered with the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Appellate Authority's Order in Service Matter for Violation of Natural Justice. Non-grant of Personal Hearing and Non-supply of Reasoned Order Under Regulation 47 of Marathwada Gramin Bank Officers and Employees Service Regulations 2001 Held Arbitrary....

The petitioner, an Officer/Branch Manager of Maharashtra Gramin Bank, challenged an appellate decision of the Board of Directors communicated by letter dated 10 November 2005, arising from a disciplin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging ESIC Admission Classification Based on Insurable Service Duration. Classification of insured persons into Groups I, II, III based on 5/4/3 years of service held not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioners, Samiksha Dhole and Rasika Pohare, filed writ petitions challenging the admission notice dated 28.6.2017 issued by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) for admission to ES...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Vice-Chancellor for Holding US Citizenship — Citizenship Requirement Under Section 24(1) of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities Act, 1968 is Mandatory. Petitioner's Appointment as Vice-Chancellor Was Void Ab Initio Due to Lack of Indian Citizenship, and Estoppel Cannot Override Statutory Requirement....

The petitioner, Raviprakash Govindrao Dani, was appointed as Vice-Chancellor of Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krushi Vidyapeeth, Akola (respondent No.3) on 13th August 2012 for a term of 5 years from 14th Au...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988....

The appellant, Gajanan s/o Lobhaji Dahale, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pusad, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and sentence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices Under Section 344 CrPC for Filing False Affidavits in Anticipatory Bail Proceedings — Mere Filing of False Affidavits Not Sufficient to Initiate Summary Proceedings for Contempt...

The petitioners, who were members of a Gram Panchayat, filed affidavits in support of an anticipatory bail application filed by an accused involved in offences under Sections 468 and 471 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Denial of Legal Heirship Certificate to Second Wife in Pension Dispute Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Court Interprets Rule 116(6)(a)(i) in Consonance with Hindu Personal Law, Refusing to Recognize Void Marriage for Pension Purposes....

The dispute arose from an application for a legal heirship certificate under the Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 filed by the first wife and her children of a deceased government servant. The second wi...