Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Penalty Imposed on Zilla Parishad Employee for Procedural Violation. The court held that the disciplinary authority failed to conduct a proper inquiry under Rule 4(iv) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964, and the petitioner was not afforded reasonable opportunity of hearing....

The petitioner, Aniruddha Nagorao Chinchkhedkar, an employee of Zilla Parishad, Jalna, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: one dated 12.09.2002...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeals Against Restitution of Conjugal Rights Decree and Dismissal of Divorce Petition. Husband Failed to Prove Cruelty or Desertion; Wife's Refusal to Stay with In-Laws Not Unreasonable....

The case involves two appeals filed by the husband, Rakesh Jaiswal, against the judgments of the Family Court, Aurangabad. The first appeal (FCA No. 8/2011) challenges the decree of restitution of con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Parole Extension Due to Wife's Medical Emergency. Prison authorities directed to consider humanitarian grounds for extension of parole under Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959....

The petitioner, Hariom Vijay Pandey, a convict lodged in Nashik Road Central Prison, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking extension of parole by two d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Parole for Medical Treatment of Mother Despite Prison Overcrowding. Parole granted under Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 for compassionate reasons, not as a matter of right....

The petitioner, Roshan alias Chini Danichand Thakur, a convict serving sentence in Nashik Road Central Prison, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the order dated 20th May 2017 passed by the De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Civil Application in PIL Challenging Order to Destroy Tigress Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Permission to Hunt Man-Eater Tigress Upheld as Chief Wildlife Warden’s Satisfaction Was Based on Relevant Material Without Overstepping Statutory Powers....

The petitioner, Dr. Jerryl Avinash Banait, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging an order dated 9.10.2017 passed by the Chief Wildlife Warden & Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Due to Inordinate Delay and Non-Application of Mind — Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, Section 56. Externment order set aside as stale offences, acquittals ignored, and stereotype witness statements violated principles of natural justice....

The petitioner, Kishor Rambhaoji Narad, challenged an externment order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Warora, under Section 56 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, externing him from Chandra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition for Interim Maintenance in Divorce Proceedings — Husband's Earning Capacity Assessed at ₹2 Lakhs per Month. The court directed the husband to pay ₹15,000 per month as interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, considering the wife's dire straits and the husband's income....

The petitioner, Mrs. Susan Thereza Pinto alias Susan Cardeiro, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 29/12/2008 passed by the Senior...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Disposes of Appeals Challenging Apportionment of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act. Reference Court Had Awarded Entire Compensation to One Party Without Framing Issues or Properly Evaluating Evidence Under Section 30, Land Acquisition Act, 1894....

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard three first appeals against the judgment of the Reference Court dated 15.07.2010, which had awarded the entire compensation of ₹13,865 with interest to party no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Acquiring Department in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at ₹90 per sq.mt. Upheld. Reference Court's enhancement from ₹3 to ₹90 per sq.mt. based on comparable sale instances and location of orchard land near village Candola under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894....

The case involves a first appeal by the Land Acquisition Officer and the Executive Engineer (the Acquiring Department) against the Judgment and Award dated 21/12/2013 passed by the District Judge-I, N...