Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Udhav s/o Yadavrao Bhosale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No.73/2001 for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Anganwadi Sevika Selection Due to Lack of Clear Language Guidelines. Court sets aside selection and directs fresh selection with proper guidelines under Government Resolution dated 13.8.2014....

The case involves two writ petitions challenging the process of appointment of Anganwadi Sevika for village Krushna, held as per proclamation dated 1.8.2016. The petitioners, Sau. Lalita Pravin Wankhe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine Transaction; Appellate Court's Reversal of Finding on Nature of Transaction Was Justified....

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property. The appellants ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners to Obtain Commission to Singapore Under Section 27 of Arbitration Act. Issuing Commission to Foreign Country Does Not Amount to Change of Venue of Arbitration....

The petition was filed under section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the two petitioners, who were the original respondents in the arbitration proceedings, seeking issuance of a co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Businessman in Essential Commodities Act Matter; Finds Prosecution Malicious and Without Evidence. FIR Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC as Adulteration Allegations Not Supported by Laboratory Tests....

The applicant, a businessman dealing in milk powder and chemicals, was implicated in an FIR registered on 2-10-2005 at Topkhana Police Station, Ahmednagar, for offences under Sections 420, 328, 308, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Sexual Assault....

The appellant, Dadarao Gotiramji Khandare, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Amravati, under Sections 4 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) for allegedly ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Maroti Shivram Nilekar and Shamrao Murlidhar Thuse, under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code for gang rape. The inciden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Order by Village Panchayat — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Hearing. Demolition order set aside as panchayat failed to provide opportunity of hearing before directing demolition of structure under Section 135 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994....

The petitioners, legal heirs of Smt. Maria Quiteria Rodrigues, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition order dated 30th June 2017 passed by the Village Panchayat of Assagao, Goa, directing demo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter’s Second Appeals in RERA Dispute as No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Interest Liability from 1.1.2017 Upheld as Factual Finding under Section 18 of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Not Open to Reappreciation in Second Appeal under Section 58 Read with Section 100 CPC....

The dispute arose from complaints filed by allottees under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 before the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA), seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Lecturer's Writ for Dereservation and Regularization of ST Reserved Post. Petitioner appointed on temporary basis on ST reserved post cannot claim dereservation or regularization after 15 years of service....

The petitioner, Meena Patil, a lecturer in Mathematics at SNDT College of Arts & C.B. College of Commerce and Economics, was appointed on 5 July 1999 on a temporary basis on a post reserved for Schedu...