Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Prima Facie False and Motivated Allegations. Bar Under Section 18 of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Does Not Prohibit Bail When FIR Allegations Found to Be Patently False, Relying on Supreme Court Precedent....

The appeal arose from a judgment of the trial court rejecting anticipatory bail to the three appellants, who were employees of the Government Printing Press at Wai, Satara. They were accused in Crime ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition Against Maintenance Order; Temporary Employment of Wife Not Sufficient to Disentitle Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC. Wife's appointment as Anganwadi Madatnis with honorarium of Rs.740 per month held insufficient to deem her able to maintain herself, affirming the revisional court's order of Rs.600 monthly maintenance....

This criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the order of the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, which had directed the petitioner/husband to pay monthly ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Managing Director and President of Ford India and Car Dealer Directors in Alleged Fraud Case. Sale of Used Car Disguised as New Model Leads to Allegations of Cheating and Forgery, but Court Finds No Involvement of Manufacturer....

The judgment of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad dealt with three criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. I-91/2018 regist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Sub-Divisional Officer in SC/ST Act Case — Holds Allegations of Outraging Modesty Were Abuse of Process. The Court Found That the Complainant, a Tahsildar, Misused Her Gender and Scheduled Caste Status to Harass Superior Officers, and No Offence Under IPC or SC/ST Act Was Made Out....

The applicants, a Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO) and his stenographer, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 139 of 2013 registered a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 304-I IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Homicidal Strangulation and Witnesses Turned Hostile....

The appellants, Shobhelal, Pruthviraj, and Munna, were convicted by the Sessions Court, Bhandara, under Section 304-I read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Taman, and sentenced to 10 years rigoro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Accused's Failure to Explain Disappearance of Deceased Leads to Guilt Under Sections 302, 364, 201 IPC....

The appellant, Bhimrao Bankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur for the murder of his brother-in-law, Atul, under Section 302 IPC, kidnapping under Section 364 IPC, and causing d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Emergency Parole for Convict's Daughter's Marriage Despite One-Year Gap Rule Under Amended Prison Rules. The proviso to Rule 19(1) of the Maharashtra Prisons Rules applies only to parole granted after the notification date, not to the first occasion after notification....

The petitioner, a convict aged about 69 years, was undergoing imprisonment at Central Prison, Nagpur. He applied for emergency parole to attend his daughter's marriage scheduled on 28-06-2018. The res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Leave for Life Convict — Adverse Police Report Based on Expired Sentence Not Valid. Petitioner's Sentence Under Section 392 IPC Already Served, Hence Cannot Be Ground for Rejection....

The petitioner, a life convict convicted under Sections 302 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code, had undergone approximately 17 years of imprisonment. He had been granted furlough leave by order dated 7t...