Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Removal of Gram Panchayat Members, Holds Reasonable Cause Must Be Considered Under Section 43-A(1)(iii) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj Act, 1993. Literal Interpretation Requiring Automatic Disqualification for Four Consecutive Absences Rejected; Opportunity of Hearing Includes Evaluation of Explanations....

The petitioners were elected members of the Kalallughatta Gram Panchayat in Nelamanagala Taluk, Bangalore Rural District. Their membership was terminated by the State Government under Section 43-A(1)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in ESI Damages Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record in the order dated 19.11.2024 passed in MFA No.3185/2017....

The review petition was filed by M/s Renram Fashions India Pvt Ltd under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking review of an order dated 19.11.2024 passed by the High Court of K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Notice Under Section 148A(b) Invalid as No Proper Opportunity of Hearing Was Afforded to Assessee. The Court upheld the Single Judge's order quashing reassessment proceedings for non-compliance with procedural requirements under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961....

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by the Revenue (Income Tax Department) against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court dated 19.06.2024 in W.P.No.12537/2024. The S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Quashing of Charges Under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC in Light of Suicide Note. Petitioners Argue Deceased’s Dying Declaration Absolves Them; Prosecution Argues Circumstantial Evidence of Dowry Harassment....

The case involves a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by the husband and his parents seeking to quash the proceedings pending before the LXXI Additiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension Order of KST Constable for Non-Compliance with KSRTC Regulations. Suspension order set aside as disciplinary authority failed to follow mandatory procedure under Regulation 10(1)(b) of KSRTC Employees' (Classification, Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1973....

The petitioner, Sri. Chandrashekhar S/o Shivappa Gosaladoddi, was appointed as a KST constable at Koppal Division on 13.05.2016. Due to shortage of staff at the respondent's division, he was assigned ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Gram Panchayat President for Violation of Mandatory Procedure Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice Issued Without Prior Resolution of No-Confidence Motion by Gram Panchayat is Illegal and Arbitrary....

The petitioner, Chethana A Channabasappa, the President of Hosahalli Gram Panchayat, challenged a notice dated 06.01.2025 issued by the Assistant Commissioner (Respondent No.3) calling for a meeting t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President and Vice President. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993....

The petitioners, Sharada (President) and V. Gangadhara (Vice President) of Somasamudra Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the no-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — No Right of Appeal Against Award Based on No Fault Liability Under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The appeal challenging the quantum of compensation awarded under no fault liability was not maintainable as the insurer had no right to contest the award on merits....

The case involves an appeal filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 03.01.2018 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, CJM and Additional MACT, Gadag in M...