Madras High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in W.P.No.11857 of 2025 — Representation Favourably Considered. The court closed the contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, as the respondents had complied with the earlier order by favourably considering the petitioner's representation....

The petitioner, Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College (Autonomous), represented by its Secretary, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedienc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in W.P.No.11857 of 2025 — Representation Favourably Considered. The court held that compliance with the earlier order renders contempt proceedings infructuous, and closed the petition without costs....

The petitioner, Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College (Autonomous), represented by its Secretary Mr. G. Abiruben, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition Against Registrar of Anna University After Compliance with Writ Order. Contempt proceedings under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 closed as respondent complied with order dated 01.08.2025 in W.P.No.28260 of 2025....

The petitioner, E. Venkatraman, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience by the respondent, Dr. J. Prakash, Registrar of Anna Unive...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order to Consider Maternity Leave Representation. Court holds that once representation is considered and rejected, contempt proceedings are not maintainable, but petitioner may challenge rejection order....

The petitioner, A.Regina, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging wilful disobedience of an order dated 07.08.2025 passed by the Madras High Court in W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in Writ Petition — No Costs Imposed. Contempt proceedings under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, were closed as the respondent complied with the court's order dated 07.08.2025 in W.P.No.5630 of 2025....

The petitioner, G. Murali, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience by the respondent, Dr. J. Prakash, Registrar of Anna University...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Court Order. Petitioner's counsel confirms compliance, leading to closure of contempt proceedings under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971....

The case involves a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, by Dr. J.M. Asgarali Patel against Dr. M. Prakash, the Registrar of Annamalai University, alleging wil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in Service Matter. Directions issued in W.P.No.25416 of 2025 were complied with by the respondents, leading to closure of contempt proceedings....

The contempt petition was filed by G. Sampanki, a Junior Engineer Grade-I, against Dr. J. Radhakrishnan (Chairman and Managing Director, TANGEDCO), Mrs. M. Ambiga (Chief Engineer, Personnel), and Mr. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Earlier Order in Service Matter — Departmental Order Passed Pursuant to Writ Directions. The Court recorded the respondent's submission of compliance and closed the petition, granting liberty to the petitioners to challenge the compliance order if aggrieved....

The present contempt petition was filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, by two petitioners, A.Rajamohammed and N.Ramarpandi, who are P.G. Assistants in Government Higher Secondar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Rejects Implead Petition as Main Appeal Already Disposed — Petitioner Permitted to Withdraw with Liberty to File Fresh Appeal or Other Remedy. Implead petition filed after disposal of main writ appeal held not maintainable....

The petitioner filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition at the SR (scrutiny) stage seeking to implead himself as the 6th respondent in a writ appeal. However, the main writ appeal had already been dispose...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Apportionment of Negligence Between Driver and Deceased Upheld. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding of contributory negligence at 50% each and recalculated compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, applying future prospects and appropriate multiplier....

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 10.03.2019, when the deceased, A.R. Rajkumar, was riding a motorcycle and collided with a car driven by the first respondent. The claimants, moth...