High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Corruption Case — Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Must Be Granted by Competent Authority Before Taking Cognizance, Not Before Filing Charge Sheet....

The case involves two criminal revision petitions arising from an order dated 23.08.2017 passed by the LXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Bengaluru, in Special C.C. No.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC....

The appellant, M/s. Shree Garodi Steels, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent, M/s. Yojaka India Private Ltd., in O.S. No. 739/2022 before the II Additional Civil Judge, Mangal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Failure to Prove Loan Repayment or Dispute Existence of Debt Leads to Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881....

The appellant-complainant, Sri Krishna Reddy M, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment of acquittal dated 20 November 2014 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Suit for Possession Based on Title and Prior Possession Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Within 12 Years....

The case involves a second appeal filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against the concurrent judgment and decree of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court dismissing their suit for possession. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Allowing Voluntary Retirement of Assistant. Rule 48-A of CCS Pension Rules Prevails Over Administrative Circulars and Fundamental Rule 56(k)(1) — Employer's Rejection on Grounds of Staff Shortage Held Arbitrary....

The Union of India and others (petitioners) challenged the order dated 01.03.2024 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, which allowed the original application of Satish Namdeorao Andra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Comunidade's Challenge to RTI Orders — Holds Comunidades Not Public Authorities Under RTI Act. Administrative tutelage under Code of Comunidades does not make Comunidades 'public authorities' under Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, and no officer can be deemed a Public Information Officer....

The Bombay High Court at Goa disposed of a batch of writ petitions challenging orders under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) that directed Comunidades (village communities in Goa) to provi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Denial of Approval for Assistant Teacher Appointment Due to Non-Compliance with Recruitment Rules. Appointment Not Through Pavitra Portal and Advertisement in Weekly Newspaper Not Sufficient Under Rule 9(2A) of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981....

The petitioner, appointed as an assistant teacher on 1st June 2018 at Sane Guruji Vidhya Mandir, challenged the order dated 21st September 2023 of the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Jalg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Default Bail Appeals in UAPA Case — Extension of Investigation Time Valid Despite Procedural Irregularities. Supreme Court Had Restored Extension Order, Charge-Sheet Filed Within Extended Period, Hence No Indefeasible Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC....

The case involves two criminal appeals challenging a common order dated 28th June 2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, NIA, Greater Mumbai, rejecting applications for default bail under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Election of Respondent No. 4 to GFA Executive Committee — Disqualification Under Article 27 of GFA Statutes Requires Both Being Charged and Charges Framed for Non-Bailable Offence. The court held that since charges were not framed before compounding, Respondent No. 4 was not disqualified and there was no suppression....

The Petitioner, a candidate for the post of President of the Goa Football Association (GFA), challenged the election of Respondent No. 4 on the ground that Respondent No. 4 was disqualified under Arti...