High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Discharge of Managing Director in TDS Non-Remittance Case — Prima Facie Case Made Out Under Section 276B of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the Trial Court erred in discharging the accused without considering the complaint allegations and documents showing his role as principal officer....

The Income Tax Department filed a complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. alleging that accused No.1 (Company) and other accused, including the respondent (Managing Director), failed to remit TDS of Rs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Matter — No Interference with Possession Notice as Debtor Failed to Discharge Liability. Court Held That Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Used to Circumvent Statutory Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002....

The petitioners, Sri S.V. Ramaswamy, Mrs. Usha Ramaswamy, and R.K. Associates (a partnership firm), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court of Karnataka at Be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Trust's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Market Yard Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to Preliminary Notification Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Filed After Over a Year Held Not Maintainable....

The Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust filed two writ petitions challenging the acquisition of its land by the State of Karnataka for the benefit of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Yeshwanthpura, Be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Workman's Right to Advocate in Domestic Enquiry. Management Representative with HR Background and Enquiry Experience Deemed Legally Trained Mind, Justifying Workman's Right to Legal Representation Under MRTU & PULP Act....

The case involves a challenge by the employer, The Indian Express (P) Ltd and its officers, against an order of the Industrial Court at Thane dated 9 December 2024. The Industrial Court allowed the wo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Licensee's Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for License Renewal Against MIDC. Licensee Has No Vested Right to Compel Statutory Authority to Allot Land After Expiry of License....

The petitioner, Sisters Of Our Lady Fatima, a trust running a school, was granted a license by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) to use an open plot of land adjoining its schoo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Owner with Valid Learner's Licence Not Liable for Compensation; Insurance Company Directed to Pay and Recover. Learner's Licence Held Valid Driving Licence Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Breach of Rule 3 of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 Not Established as No Evidence of Contravention....

The appellant, Ku. Nilima Dakhane, was the owner of a Kinetic Nova scooter involved in an accident on 10.04.2003, in which respondent No.2, Pandurang Charge, sustained a fracture to his left leg. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Plaintiff’s Suit for Declaration of Title and Compensation for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail. Suit Filed Under CPC Order VII Rule 1 and Madras High Court Original Side Rules Seeks Compensation for Grama Natham Land in Saligramam Village....

The plaintiff, D. Shankar, instituted Civil Suit No. 725 of 2018 before the Madras High Court seeking a declaration of ownership over three parcels of land (Schedule A, B, and C) situated in Saligrama...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Retailers in Insecticide Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 Renders Prosecution Unsustainable....

The petitioners, Devanand and Basanagouda Mali Patil, were accused Nos. 1 and 2 in CC No. 688/2022 pending before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Shahapur, for offences under Sections 3(k), 13, 17, and 29 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Period. Notice period of 15 days under Section 49(2A) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is mandatory and cannot be waived; motion passed on 14th day invalid....

The petitioner, Smt. Sharanamma, was the President of Hiresingangutti Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against her by 18 members of the Panchayat. The notice for the motion was issued ...