High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Workman's Appeal in Employee's Compensation Case, Directing Interest on Medical Expenses. Interest Held Payable at 12% from Date of Accident Under Section 4-A(3)(a) of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 Despite No Disability Award....

The dispute originated from a claim petition filed by the appellant, a workman employed as a loadman with the first respondent, who sustained injuries on 30.07.2012 while unloading cut palm trees from...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Legal Representatives Permitted to Add Alternative Prayer for Refund of Advance. Pre-trial amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC is to be liberally allowed if it does not cause irreparable prejudice to the opposite party....

The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased plaintiff Chintamani Madhav Joshi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 18.01.2021 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Seeking Approval of Junior Clerk Appointment Due to Irregular Recruitment Process. Advertisement in Less Circulated Newspaper with Short Notice Period Constitutes Eyewash, Violating Article 16 of the Constitution....

The petitioners, Shree Doodhganga Vedhganga Shikshan Prasarak Mandal (the managing institution), the Headmaster of Pratibha High School, and Shital Dilip Patil (the selected candidate), challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes ITAT Order on Income Classification — Jurisdiction Exceeded. The ITAT exceeded its jurisdiction by reclassifying income from PGHH, which had already been determined as income from other sources under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961....

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Procter and Gamble Home Products Private Limited against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 2 September 2022. The petitioner, en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Refund of Excess Recovery in Income Tax Stay Matter — Petitioner Voluntarily Paid 20% Demand, Revenue Adjusted Refund Beyond Permitted Limit. Adjustment of Refund Against Stayed Demand Violates Instruction No.1914 and Stay Order Dated 17 April 2024....

The petitioner, an individual, filed his return of income for assessment year 2015-2016 on 28 September 2015, declaring income of Rs.56,65,660/-. The return was selected for scrutiny, and an assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Despite Objections on Privity of Arbitration Agreement. Court limits its inquiry under Section 11(6A) to existence of arbitration agreement, leaving issues of privity and liability to arbitral tribunal under Section 16....

The Petitioner, Darshan Mahendra Nibjya, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a substitute arbitrator after the presiding arbitrator ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within 10 Years. Petitioners' land reserved for school purposes not acquired despite notice; court declares reservation lapsed and directs publication of notification....

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Gat No. 105/2+3 at Village Bale, Solapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that the reservations (Nos. 11/53 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoters' Challenge to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA — Upholds Competent Authority's Order Including Recreational Ground Area. The Court held that the Competent Authority's order under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 was valid and the petitioners' objections regarding excess land and right of way were not sustainable....

The petitioners, Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt. Ltd., Rajesh Himatlal, and Wonder Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court, cha...