High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Ex Parte Temporary Injunction in Land Dispute Due to Non-Compliance with Order 39 Rule 3 CPC. Petitioner's Right to Be Heard Before Injunction Upheld Under Order 39 Rule 3 CPC....

The petitioner, Vishwanath S/o Basappa Baati, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, challenging an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Malafide Prosecution. Allegations of Rape on False Promise of Marriage Found Baseless as Relationship Was Consensual and Complaint Filed After Civil Dispute....

The petitioner, Arunkumar, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking qua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction Granted by Sub-Divisional Officer Instead of Collector Held Incompetent, Despite Satisfactory Evidence of Demand and Acceptance....

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Satara, appealed against the acquittal of Ramdas Bhagwan Vairat, a Talathi (village revenue officer), who was charged under Sections 7, 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Cancellation of Registration of a Child Care Institution: Judicial Scrutiny of Quasi-Judicial Actions. Quasi-Judicial Nature of Child Care Institution Licensing Under the Juvenile Justice Act....

The Court determined that the cancellation of the institution’s registration was a quasi-judicial act due to the statutory requirements for inquiry and adherence to procedural norms under the Juveni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition as Misuse of Process in Redevelopment Dispute with Non-Member Occupant. Court holds that a developer cannot seek interim relief against a non-signatory occupant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where the occupant has independent rights and is not bound by the arbitration agreement....

The petitioner, Gulshan Townplanners LLP, a developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim relief against the respondent, Baiju Mahendra Dosh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Clarifies Powers of Collector under Section 142 of Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Court Expands the Scope of "Any Place" in Section 142(1) to Include Multiple Licensed Shops in the Interest of Public Peace....

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of the Collector's powers under Section 142(1) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The petitioners challenged the orders issued by various Collectors ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Considers Whether Arbitrator Has Jurisdiction to Pass Successive Awards and Whether Claims Are Barred by Res Judicata. Challenge to Awards Confirmed by Lower Court Raises Issues of Functus Officio and Splitting of Claims under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The appeals arose from two arbitration awards passed by the sole arbitrator in disputes between Mysore Lamp Works Limited (appellant) and S.V. Engineers and Contractors (respondent No.1) regarding sub...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Bar Council of India’s Gag Order on Advocates for Infringing Fundamental Right to Speech. The Court Holds That Neither the Bar Council of India Nor Its Chairman Possess Power Under the Advocates Act, 1961 to Restrain Advocates from Making Public Statements, Rendering the Order Void Ab Initio....

The petitioner, a practicing advocate and member of the Karnataka State Bar Council, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12-04-2024 issued b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Order and Clarifies Building Plan Sanctioning Authority in KIADB Industrial Areas. Government Order Issued Pursuant to Court Direction Confirms KIADB as Authority After Sale Deed Execution....

The petitioner, proprietor of Vishnu Hotel, constructed a hotel on a plot in Bommasandra Industrial Area allotted by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) in 1995. A registered sale...