Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Seeking to Enable Participation in Assistant Professor Recruitment After Addendum Issued. Court Records That Addendum Already Allows Eligible Candidates, Rendering Mandamus Unnecessary.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus direction against the third respondent, Teachers Recruitment Board, to issue an addendum to Notification No.1 of 2025 dated 24.01.2025, thereby enabling him to apply for the post of Assistant Professor in Government Law Colleges. He made representations on 27.01.2025 and 11.02.2025 before approaching the court. During the hearing, the Standing Counsel for the Teachers Recruitment Board produced a copy of an addendum dated 21.02.2025, which stated that such candidates would be allowed to appear for the written examination for the posts of Associate Professor and Assistant Professor. In view of this development, the court recorded that the relief sought by the petitioner had already been addressed by the issuance of the addendum. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of, rendering any further mandamus unnecessary. The court did not delve into the merits of the eligibility criteria or the notification. The proceedings concluded without any adverse order against the respondents, and the petitioner was effectively granted the opportunity he sought. The case was closed on 24.02.2025.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Recruitment Notification - Addendum - Constitution of India, Article 226 - The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Teachers Recruitment Board to issue an addendum to Notification No.1 of 2025 dated 24.01.2025 to allow him to apply for the Assistant Professor post. During hearing, the Board placed a copy of addendum dated 21.02.2025 before the court, which already provided that such candidates would be permitted to appear for the written examination. Held, that in view of the addendum, the writ petition was disposed of recording the same. (Para 2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing the Teachers Recruitment Board to issue an addendum to Notification No.1 of 2025 to enable the petitioner to apply for the post of Assistant Professor.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was disposed of in view of the addendum dated 21.02.2025 issued by the Teachers Recruitment Board, which addressed the petitioner's grievance.

Law Points

  • Writ of mandamus becomes infructuous when the relief sought is already granted by the authority before the court passes an order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 268

W.P.(MD) No.4359 of 2025

2025-02-24

Battu Devanand

Meenakshi Rama Prabhu, M.Siddharthan, V.R.Shanmuganathan

Hariharan

1.The Secretary, Higher Education Department; 2.The Secretary, Law Department; 3.The Chairperson, Teachers Recruitment Board; 4.The Director of Legal Education

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus.

Remedy Sought

Directing the third respondent to issue an addendum to Notification No.1 of 2025 to enable the petitioner to apply for the Assistant Professor post and participate in the selection process.

Filing Reason

The petitioner desired to apply for the post but found himself unable due to the existing notification terms, thus sought an addendum through representations and later through the writ petition.

Issues

Whether the Teachers Recruitment Board should be directed to issue an addendum to Notification No.1 of 2025 to permit the petitioner's candidature.

Submissions/Arguments

The Teachers Recruitment Board placed a copy of the addendum dated 21.02.2025, which already permitted such candidates, obviating the need for a mandamus.

Judgment Excerpts

During the course of hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the third respondent / Teachers Recruitment Board has placed a copy of the addendum dated 21.02.2025, wherein it is stated that such candidates will be allowed to appear for the Written Examination for the post of Associate Professor, Assistant...

Procedural History

The petitioner made representations on 27.01.2025 and 11.02.2025 to the respondents seeking an addendum. Subsequently, the writ petition was filed. During its pendency, the third respondent issued an addendum on 21.02.2025. The matter was heard on 24.02.2025 and disposed of thereafter.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Police Protection for Cultivation in Injunction Suit — Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Application for Police Aid Despite Subsisting Interim Injunction. Court holds that police protection is a necessary concomitant of an int...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Invoices Under Dealership Agreement. The court found that the arbitration clause in the Dealership Agreement dated 19/06/2013 was valid and disputes existed, wa...