High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petitions Challenging Preventive Detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 in NDPS Offences. Detention orders upheld as delay between arrest and detention was justified by gravity of crime and investigation; life and proximity theory not applicable....

The case involved five Habeas Corpus Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, challenging preventive detention orders passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention of 'Goonda' Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. Court Finds Detention Order Suffers No Infirmity or Non-Application of Mind Despite Delay and Representation Allegations....

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court considered a habeas corpus petition filed by the mother of the detenu, Alex @ Alaguraja, challenging the preventive detention order dated 02.07.2024 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020183482022_1...

The appellant was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ballari for offences under Sections 498A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for allegedly causing the dowry death of h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal, Upholds Applicability of Section 50C to Transfer of Leasehold Rights. Leasehold Rights Constitute Capital Asset and Assignment Thereof Attracts Section 50C Deeming Provision....

The appeal arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Nagpur dated 24.03.2017 dismissing the assessee's claim that Section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 did not apply to the transfer ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Legality of Unreasoned Decision on Notary Application. Collector's Omission to Provide Reasons Raises Issue Under Article 226 of the Constitution....

The petitioner, Surekhaben Chhaniyabhai Varli, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging the failure of the Collec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2973 OF 2025...

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 890 OF 2025...

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Holds That Section 9 Petition Cannot Be Maintained Against Non-Signatory Tenants When No Inter-Se Dispute Exists Among Arbitration Agreement Parties. Developer's Reliance on Development Agreement to Evict Tenants Fails as Tenants Lack Privity to the Arbitration Agreement Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The dispute arose from a redevelopment project of a co-operative housing society in Mumbai. Ambit Urbanspace, a developer, entered into a Development Agreement dated May 21, 2024 with Poddar Apartment...