High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay — Detention Order Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Snapped. Preventive detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 held invalid where 54-day delay between arrest and detention order remained unexplained, following Sushanta Kumar Banik v. State of Tripura....

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Kumar, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Avadi City, under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 brandi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Unexplained Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982....

The petitioner, Kalavathi, sister of the detenu Iyyappan, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Avadi City, under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Unexplained delay of 54 days between arrest and detention order renders detention invalid under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982....

The petitioner, sister of the detenu Manikandan @ Pambu Mani, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Avadi City, under the Tamil Nadu Act ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Non-Commercial Quantity and Lack of Proximity. Recovery of 8 kg of Ganja Not Commercial Quantity Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, Adverse Case Lacks Proximity with Ground Case....

The petitioner, Kathija, wife of Mohideen, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the preventive detention of her son, Y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Inordinate Delay in Passing Detention Order — Live and Proximate Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Renders Detention Invalid....

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Mohankumar @ Raja, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Avadi City, under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Snapping of Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Without Explanation Renders Detention Invalid....

The petitioner, Surya, brother of the detenu Karthick, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the detention order passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Drug Offender Preventive Detention Case Due to Non-Commercial Quantity and Lack of Proximity Between Cases. Recovery of 2.500 Kgs of Ganja Not Commercial Quantity Under NDPS Act, Adverse Case Not Connected to Ground Case....

The petitioner, Kalaivani, wife of the detenu Partheban @ Nondi Parthiban, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the preventive detention order pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Drug Offender Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Detention Order Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Snapped. Unexplained delay of 46 days between arrest and detention order renders subjective satisfaction doubtful under preventive detention law....

The petitioner, G. Annakili, wife of the detenu Gunasekaran, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the detention order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Drug Offender Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Passing Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of 32 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Section 2(e) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982....

The petitioner, Sakthivel, father of the detenu Sathiyaseelan, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the detention orde...