High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner in Habeas Corpus Petition as Withdrawn. Withdrawal request by counsel for the detenue's husband led to dismissal of the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without adjudication on merits....

The matter before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court was a Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Arthi Shyam, described as the husband of the detenue, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Recovery of Money Suit — Limitation Period for Refund of Advance Under Agreement to Sell Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, Not Article 24. Agreement to Sell Not a Bond, Hence Article 24 Inapplicable; Suit Filed Within Three Years from Date of Refusal to Execute Sale Deed Is Within Limitation....

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for recovery of money seeking refund of an advance amount of Rs. 5,00,000 paid to the respondent-defendant under an agreement to sell dated 17.02.2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved, Limitation Barred Suit. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and payment of earnest money; suit filed beyond three years from date of refusal....

The present Regular First Appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 03.08.2022 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Dharwad, in O.S. No.511/2014. The appellant, originally defendan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seniority List in Junior Assistant Cadre Due to Incorrect Placement of Hyderabad-Karnataka Region Appointees. Seniority Must Be Based on Date of Appointment, Not Reservation Status....

The petitioner, Kallappa Gonnagar, a Junior Assistant in the O&M Division of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL), challenged the seniority list dated 02.08.2023 published by the 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Robbery and Extortion Case Due to Parity and Lack of Criminal Antecedents. Petitioners/accused Nos. 3 and 4 were granted bail under Section 483 BNSS / Section 439 CrPC for offences under Sections 310(2), 311, 238, 312 of BNS 2023, as co-accused were already enlarged on bail....

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard two criminal petitions filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Robbery and Extortion Case Under BNS 2023 — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out Against Accused Nos. 3 and 4. Court held that mere presence at the scene without specific overt acts does not justify denial of bail under Sections 310(2), 311, 238, 312 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023....

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) seeking bail for the p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Quashing of NDPS Proceedings for Alleged Violation of Section 52A. Court Holds That Section 52A Procedure Complied With as Inventory and Sampling Done in Presence of Magistrate, and Challenge Based on Inadmissible Confession Statement Cannot Be Decided at Pre-trial Stage....

The petitioner, arrayed as accused No. 2 in a case under Sections 21 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, challenged the criminal proceedings pending in Special C.C. No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Janaushadhi Kendra Approval — No Violation of Guidelines Found. Petitioner's claim that respondent's Kendra was within prohibited distance from her own Kendra rejected as guidelines only restrict distance between two Kendras, not between a Kendra and a proposed one....

The petitioner, Smt. Savinaya, operated a Janaushadhi Kendra under the Pradhan Mantri Bharatiya Janaushadhi Pariyojana (PMBJP) in Dakshina Kannada district. She challenged a communication dated 02-04-...