High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal in Patent Infringement Suit — Interim Injunction Granted to Protect Patent Rights Pending Trial. Court holds that a prima facie case for infringement and balance of convenience favor the patentee, and irreparable injury would result if injunction is refused....

The appellant, Balasaheb Sonba Chavan, filed a suit for patent infringement against the respondents, Dilip Baburao Rajput (since deceased) through his legal heirs and others, alleging that the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Petrofer Chemie and Hardcastle Petrofer v. United Petrofer Limited. Use of identical mark 'PETROFER' by defendant for similar industrial chemicals constitutes prima facie infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999....

The plaintiffs, Petrofer Chemie H.R. Fischer GMBH & Co. KG (a German company) and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited (an Indian company), filed a commercial suit for trademark infringement and passin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Legal Representatives' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Unexplained Delay and Procedural Lapses. Legal Representatives' Failure to Seek Leave to Appeal and Filing a False Affidavit Precluded Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963....

The case arose from the acquisition of land belonging to H.D. Lokeshaiah in Halanuru village, Tumakuru Taluk, for the construction of the Hemavathi Canal. The land, measuring 13 guntas in Sy.No.125/1 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Removal of Mosque Committee Members for Violation of Natural Justice — Waqf Board Approval Required for Executive Committee Changes Under Waqf Act, 1995....

The petitioners, Abdul Sattar and Mohammad Mustafa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. They sought to quash ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Promotion Representation in Service Matter — Writ of Mandamus Sought for Promotion to Accounts Officer Post. Court Orders Respondent to Consider Petitioner's Representation for Promotion with Effect from 16/04/2018 Without Expressing Opinion on Merits....

The petitioner, an Assistant Accounts Officer in Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. (KPTCL), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Government's Order Directing University to Recover Salary Paid to Assistant Professor During Suspension Period. Recovery of Salary Without Providing Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice....

The petitioner, Dr. Basavaraj R. Bagade, an Assistant Professor at Rani Channamma University, Belagavi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order/letter...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct....

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which directed payment of gratuity to responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement....

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which directed payment of gratuity of Rs.10 lak...