Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification of Member Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act — Resignation from Directorship of Another Society Not Attracting Section 73A Disqualification. The Court held that Section 73A disqualification applies only when a person simultaneously holds office as a 'designated officer' in two societies, and resignation after the stipulated period does not trigger disqualification under Section 73CA.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 266
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shashikant Balkrushna Gaikwad, challenged his disqualification as a member of respondent no.5-Society, Akola Zilla Parishad Prathamik Shikshak Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd., under Section 73A and Section 73CA of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The disqualification was based on his resignation from the post of Director of the Managing Committee of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Zilla Parishad Magasvargiya Karmachari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd., Akola-Washim, after the stipulated period of ten days from the date of declaration of the last election result. The petitioner argued that Section 73A disqualification applies only to 'designated officers' holding office in two societies simultaneously, and he was not a designated officer of the second society. He also contended that Section 73CA disqualification applies only to resignation from the office of a member of the committee of the same society, not from directorship of another society. The Court agreed with the petitioner's submissions, holding that the impugned orders were unsustainable. The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the orders of the Minister, Divisional Joint Registrar, and District Deputy Registrar, and restored the petitioner's membership. The Court directed that the petitioner be allowed to function as a member of respondent no.5-Society.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Disqualification of Member - Section 73A Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Designated Officer - The petitioner was disqualified by the Minister under Section 73A for allegedly acting as a designated officer of two societies simultaneously. The Court held that Section 73A applies only to 'designated officers' as defined under the Act, and the petitioner was not a designated officer of the second society. The disqualification under Section 73A was not attracted. (Paras 3-5)

B) Cooperative Law - Disqualification of Member - Section 73CA Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Resignation after Stipulated Period - The petitioner resigned as Director of another society after ten days from the date of declaration of election result. The Court held that Section 73CA disqualification applies only to resignation from the office of a member of the committee of the same society, not from directorship of another society. The disqualification under Section 73CA was not attracted. (Paras 3-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner incurred disqualification under Section 73A or Section 73CA of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, for having tendered resignation from the post of Director of another society after the stipulated period.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned orders passed by the respondent no.1-Hon’ble Minister, respondent no.2-Divisional Joint Registrar, and respondent no.3-District Deputy Registrar are quashed and set aside. The petitioner is restored as a member of respondent no.5-Society and shall be allowed to function as such.

Law Points

  • Section 73A disqualification applies only to 'designated officers' holding office in two societies simultaneously
  • Section 73CA disqualification for resignation after stipulated period not attracted if resignation is from directorship not covered under the provision
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (11) 458

WRIT PETITION NO. 1495 OF 2025

2025-11-04

Prafulla S. Khubalkar, J.

2025:BHC-NAG:11514

Shri M.G. Bhangde, Senior Advocate with Shri R.D. Karode for petitioner; Ms P.C. Bawankule, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 to 3; Shri C.S. Kaptan, Senior Advocate with Shri A.M. Ghare for respondent no.4; Shri A.D. Gabhane for respondent no.5

Shashikant Balkrushna Gaikwad

The Hon’ble Minister, Co-operation Department, Government of Maharashtra; The Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Amravati; District Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Akola; Nilesh Vasantrao Kale; Akola Zilla Parishad Prathamik Shikshak Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd., Akola; Maroti Laxmanrao Warokar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging disqualification of a member of a cooperative society under Sections 73A and 73CA of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of orders passed by the Minister, Divisional Joint Registrar, and District Deputy Registrar disqualifying him as a member of respondent no.5-Society.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was disqualified on the ground that he had tendered resignation from the post of Director of another society after the stipulated period of ten days from the date of declaration of election result.

Previous Decisions

The District Deputy Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar had held the petitioner disqualified, and the Minister upheld those orders.

Issues

Whether the petitioner incurred disqualification under Section 73A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, for acting as a designated officer of two societies simultaneously. Whether the petitioner incurred disqualification under Section 73CA of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, for resigning from the post of Director of another society after the stipulated period.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that Section 73A applies only to 'designated officers' and he was not a designated officer of the second society. Petitioner submitted that Section 73CA applies only to resignation from the office of a member of the committee of the same society, not from directorship of another society.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 73A disqualification applies only to 'designated officers' as defined under the Act, and the petitioner was not a designated officer of the second society. Section 73CA disqualification applies only to resignation from the office of a member of the committee of the same society, not from directorship of another society.

Judgment Excerpts

The controversy in the present petition arises from the challenge to disqualification of the petitioner as a Member of respondent no.5–Society incurred under Section 73A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The issue is whether the petitioner stood disqualified on the ground that he has tendered his resignation from the post of Director of the Managing Committee of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Zilla Parishad Magasvargiya Karmachari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd., Akola-Washim, after the stipulated period i.e. after ten days from the date on which the result of the last election was declared.

Procedural History

The petitioner was disqualified by the District Deputy Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar. The petitioner challenged these orders before the Minister, who upheld them. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition before the High Court. The Court heard arguments on the application for vacation of interim relief and disposed of the petition at the admission stage.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: 73A, 73CA
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 295A IPC and Section 67 IT Act in WhatsApp Group Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Insufficient Evidence -- Petitioner Acquitted of Religious Offence Charges
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Workman's Writ Appeal and Restores Labour Court Compensation in Industrial Dispute. Labour Court's Award of Rs.3,00,000 Compensation Confirmed Despite Termination for Possession of Medical Equipment Due to 15 Years of Service...