High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashed FIR and Proceedings in Special Case No.52/2020 Against Applicant – Held FIR Lacked Prima Facie Case and Sanction Under Section 196(1A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Was Not Obtained...

The Court Held That the Criminal Proceedings Were Manifestly Attended With Mala Fide and Instituted With Ulterior Motive – No Sufficient Evidence to Sustain the Charges – Quashing the FIR Secured ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 1996 Will, Awards Costs to Plaintiffs for Frivolous Opposition. Probate Granted for Last Will of Yashwantilika Narottamdas Dalal – Court Dismisses Allegations of Forgery and Undue Influence....

Execution of Will – The Plaintiffs sought probate of the Last Will and Testament of Yashwantilika Narottamdas Dalal, dated 12th December 1996. The Will was contested by Defendants alleging forgery,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court held that the entire amount of unverified purchases should be disallowed under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, rejecting partial disallowance made by appellate authorities....

Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 69C – Bogus Purchases – Profit Rate Determination – Full Disallowance – Validity of Tribunal’s Decision Failure to provide complete documentary evidence, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Premature Petition Seeking Lapse of Land Reservation Dismissed — Period of Reservation Acquisition Extended by Legislative Amendment....

Reliance on a notification prior to legislative amendment is misplaced once the statute is amended — Amended statutory period applicable from the date of notice issuance — Premature petitions are ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 260A — Bombay High Court Dismissed Appeals by Refrigerated Distributors Pvt Ltd Challenging Additions on Bogus Purchases — No Substantial Question of Law Involved...

Assessment Years 2007-08 to 2012-13 — Appellant Assessee Failed to Prove Purchases — Tribunal’s Reduction of Addition from 25% to 10% of Gross Profit Margin Confirmed — Concurrent Findings of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Hygienic Research Institute, Restraining Defendants from Using “STREAK Street” Mark Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff’s Registered Trademark “STREAX”...

Trademark Infringement and Passing Off of “STREAX” vs. “STREAK Street” The Bombay High Court, granted interim reliefs in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from using the mark...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Permission for Construction of Berthing Jetty and Cement Plant in CRZ Area, Subject to Environmental Safeguards. Balancing Development and Ecology: High Court Approves Adani Cementation’s Project with Strict Compliance Conditions...

Sustainable Development: The court reiterated the principle of sustainable development, holding that economic development and environmental protection must be balanced. The project was approved as it ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Denial of Approval for Open Distance Learning and Online Programmes Quashed Due to Violation of Natural Justice...

Violation of Natural Justice – UGC failed to provide an opportunity for hearing, which was mandatory despite its administrative nature. (Para 17, 21) Unreasoned Decision – The impugned communicati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Overturns Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, Citing Flaws in Prosecution’s Case and Unreliable Witness Testimony. Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Convincing Evidence and Benefit of Doubt...

Delay in FIR and Suppression of Information:– The court held that the delay in lodging the FIR and suppression of initial information raised serious doubts about the prosecution’s case. The court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The Bombay High Court held that the competent authority could not reject a compounding application solely on the ground of delay, as the Income-tax Act, 1961 did not prescribe a limitation period. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the Chief Commissioner to reconsider the application based on relevant facts and judicial precedents....

Income-tax Act, 1961 – Section 279(2) – Compounding of Offences – CBDT Guidelines – Discretion of Authority The court reaffirmed that when a statute does not prescribe a limitation period, on...