High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Licensee's Challenge to Arrears Demand and License Lapse in Bombay Prohibition Act Case. Demand for License Fee Arrears for Period Prior to License Grant Held Unenforceable and License Cannot Lapse Without Notice....

The petitioner, Suresh Krishnaji Lakudkar, held a CLIII license under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, for the sale of foreign liquor. In Writ Petition No. 4474 of 2008, he challenged the demand for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Property Suit. Held that the plaint discloses a cause of action and is not barred by limitation or res judicata under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC....

The petitioner, Dr. Suresh Bhalchandra Shetye, was the original defendant no.1 in a suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) seeking partition and declaration of rights in properties purcha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Inventory Decree on Ground of Fraud — Proper Remedy for Challenging Final Partition is by Suit, Not Application Under Article 771 of Portuguese Civil Procedure Code....

The appellant, Shri Gurudas B. Velip, challenged an order dated 5 December 2006 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division at Quepem, in Special Inventory Proceedings No. 9/2003/A. By that order, the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Writ Petition in Eviction Case Due to Improper Service of Notice — Service by Affixation at Business Premises Not Valid Under Rule 10 of Goa Buildings (LR&E) Control Rules, 1969....

The petitioner, a tenant occupying a shop premises as a library, fell into arrears of rent. The landlord filed eviction proceedings under Section 22(2)(a) of the Goa Buildings (LR&E) Control Act, 1968...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Village Panchayat's Writ Petitions as Not Maintainable Against Orders of Additional Director of Panchayats Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 — Panchayat Cannot Challenge Appellate Orders Passed Under Section 66(7) of the Act....

The High Court of Bombay at Goa was hearing two writ petitions filed by Village Panchayats of Sancoale and Bastora against orders passed by the Additional Director of Village Panchayats in appeals und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Right of Way and Title. Suit for Injunction Dismissed and Counterclaim for Declaration of Title and Injunction Upheld Based on Adverse Possession and Better Title....

The appellants, Efigenio Dias and Josinho Dias, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondents, Malaquias D'Costa and others, to restrain them from entering and interfering with a prope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Petitions Challenging SEBI's Show Cause Notices to Auditors of Satyam Computers. Question of SEBI's Jurisdiction under Sections 11, 11B, and 11(4) of SEBI Act Raised in Wake of Satyam Fraud Disclosure....

The matter arose from writ petitions filed by Price Waterhouse & Co. and other chartered accountant firms along with individual partners challenging the authority of the Securities and Exchange Board ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Debtors' Motion to Set Aside Insolvency Notice in Consent Decree Dispute. Failure to Pay Agreed Amount by Stipulated Date Renders Debtors Liable for Full Decretal Amount Under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909....

The petitioning creditor, Videocon Industries Ltd., filed Suit No. 1891 of 2000 against M/s Akar Laminators and the two judgment debtors, V.T. Seth & Anr., for repossession of leased equipment and rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal, Holds CESTAT Has Power to Condon Delay Under Section 129A(5) of Customs Act, 1962. The Court Remanded the Matter for Consideration of Condonation of Delay on Merits, Ruling That Appeals Under Section 129D(3) Are Deemed Appeals Under Section 129A and Thus Subject to the Same Condonation Power....

The Commissioner of Customs (Gen), Mumbai, filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) against an order of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) dated 30th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Dispute Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator. Failure to Respond to Notice Invoking Arbitration Constitutes Refusal to Appoint Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The petitioner, M/s. Khurana Constructions, entered into an agreement with the respondent, IOT Infrastructure and Energy Services Ltd., on 28 February 2005 for civil and underground piping work relate...