High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Communicate Reasons for Rejecting College Permission Application. State Government Failed to Comply with Earlier Court Order to Provide Reasons for Rejection of Application Under Section 83 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994....

The petitioner, a trust and society registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act and the Societies Registration Act, applied to respondent No.2 (the University) for permission to start an Arts College...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Land Acquisition Officer Reducing Compensation for Tenanted Agricultural Land. Tenanted Land Cannot Be Valued at Par with Developed Plots Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894....

The case pertains to an appeal by the Additional Deputy Collector and Land Acquisition Officer against the Judgment and Award dated 30.6.2004 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Panaji, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Procedural Order on Discovery — Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Permit Challenge to Procedural Orders, Only Final Awards....

The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Tata Industries Limited and another against Grasim Industries Limited, challenging a procedural or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Challenge to Interim Maintenance Order — Income Tax Returns Not Conclusive for Maintenance. Court Holds That Net Taxable Income Is Not the Sole Basis for Determining Maintenance Under Matrimonial Law....

The petitioner husband challenged the Family Court's order granting interim maintenance of Rs.20,000 to his wife and Rs.10,000 each to their two sons. The husband argued that his net taxable income as...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Transfer Dispute Involving Tribal Vendor. Court holds that sale by tribal to non-tribal prior to amendment of Section 36 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 was valid and petitioner's possession cannot be disturbed....

The petitioner, Nimba Bula Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 26.3.1991 passed by the Member, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Bombay camp at Dhule, in LRC. TRB C 1/198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Convict to Appear for LL.B. Examination — Right to Education of Prisoners Upheld. Court Directs Release on Furlough or Police Escort for Examination Under Article 21 of Constitution....

The petitioner, Amit Gajanan Gandhi, was a convict serving life imprisonment under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, since July 1998. He had taken admission to the LL.B. (Three-Year Course) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Production of Prison Punishment Records in Convict's Remission Case. Convict's Right to Access Documents for Forfeiture of Remission Upheld....

The petitioner, Mohd. Asif Mohd. Hanif, a convict under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. He was convicted in 1993 and ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Commissioner of Labour's Order Holding Religious Trust as Commercial Establishment Under Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. Trust's Charitable and Religious Objects Exclude It from Definition of Commercial Establishment Under Section 2(4) of the Act....

The petitioner, Shri Vatavriksha Swami Maharaj Devasthan, Akkalkot, is a religious and charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act on 19 December 1953. Its main objects are charitabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Predeposit Condition for Appeal Against Interlocutory Order Under SARFAESI Act. Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Requires Deposit of 50% of Debt for Any Appeal Under Section 17, Including Interlocutory Orders, and Appellate Tribunal May Reduce to 25%....

The petitioners, M/s Vinay Container Services Pvt. Ltd. and its guarantors, challenged an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which required them to deposit 25% of the bank's claim a...