Bombay High Court Directs Production of Prison Punishment Records in Convict's Remission Case. Convict's Right to Access Documents for Forfeiture of Remission Upheld.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 109
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mohd. Asif Mohd. Hanif, a convict under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. He was convicted in 1993 and had been in jail since his arrest on 24th October 1991. The petitioner claimed that during his jail term, two punishments of forfeiture of remission were imposed on him, but he did not possess the documents related to those punishments. He sought a direction for production of the relevant documents and, upon production, appropriate relief regarding the forfeiture. The court noted that the petitioner, being in prison, lacked access to these documents. The respondents, State of Maharashtra and Superintendent of Central Prison, Amravati, were represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor. The court, after hearing the parties, directed the respondents to produce the relevant documents and records pertaining to the punishments imposed on the petitioner. The court observed that the petitioner is entitled to know the basis of the forfeiture of remission to enable him to make an effective representation. The petition was disposed of with this direction.

Headnote

A) Prison Law - Remission - Forfeiture of Remission - Production of Documents - Convict sought direction for production of records of punishments of forfeiture of remission imposed during jail term - Court directed respondents to produce relevant documents and records pertaining to punishments imposed on petitioner - Held that petitioner is entitled to know the basis of forfeiture of remission for effective representation (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to production of documents pertaining to punishments of forfeiture of remission imposed on him during his jail term, and whether such forfeiture was validly imposed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to produce the relevant documents and records pertaining to the punishments imposed on the petitioner. The petition was disposed of with this direction.

Law Points

  • Right to remission
  • forfeiture of remission
  • prison discipline
  • production of documents
  • natural justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (11) 69

Criminal Writ Petition No.55 of 2007

2010-11-16

A.H. Joshi, A.R. Joshi

S.A. Jaiswal for petitioner, S.S. Jachak (Additional Public Prosecutor) for respondents

Mohd. Asif Mohd. Hanif

State of Maharashtra, Superintendent, Central Prison, Amravati

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition seeking production of documents related to forfeiture of remission imposed on a convict.

Remedy Sought

Direction for production of documents pertaining to punishments of forfeiture of remission imposed on the petitioner during his jail term, and appropriate relief thereafter.

Filing Reason

Petitioner, a convict under Section 302 IPC, claimed that two punishments of forfeiture of remission were imposed on him but he did not possess the documents, and sought their production.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to production of documents pertaining to punishments of forfeiture of remission imposed on him during his jail term.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he does not possess the documents of punishments of forfeiture of remission imposed on him during his jail term and sought their production. Respondents did not oppose the production of documents.

Ratio Decidendi

A convict is entitled to know the basis of forfeiture of remission imposed during his jail term, and the prison authorities must produce relevant documents to enable effective representation.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a petition by the prisoner, who has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code. Petitioner prays for a direction for production of relevant documents, and upon production, the relief that the punishment of forfeiture of remission imposed on him during his jail term be set aside.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.55 of 2007 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking production of documents related to forfeiture of remission. The court heard the matter and disposed it with a direction to produce documents.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. The court held that mere denial of service without evide...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Accused Husband and Family in 498A and Dowry Harassment Case Due to Vague Allegations and Habitual Complainant. Held that Mere Stray Utterance Like Calling 'Prostitute' Does Not Constitute Cruelty Under Sec...