High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company....

The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging oppression and mismanagement in Gharda Chemicals Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Duty Credit Under Target Plus Scheme — Export House Entitled to Benefit Despite Non-Specification of Input-Output Norms. The court held that the Target Plus Scheme does not require the exported product to be covered by Standard Input-Output Norms (SION) and the denial was arbitrary....

The petitioner, M/s. Essel Mining & Industries Ltd., an Export House recognized by the Director General of Foreign Trade, engaged in the manufacture of Ferro molybdenum (falling under Heading 72.02 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Minister's Order Imposing Fine and Forfeiting Security Deposit in Kerosene Licence Renewal Dispute. Petitioner Not at Fault for Non-Renewal as Application Filed Before Expiry; Fine and Forfeiture Set Aside....

The petitioner, Subhash Rajanna Narendrulwar, was granted a semi-wholesale kerosene licence on 27/07/1992, renewed up to 31/12/2003. He applied for renewal on 29/12/2003, before expiry. However, due t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders in Domestic Violence Act Jurisdiction Dispute — Holds That JMFC at Akot Lacks Jurisdiction as Incident Occurred at Nasik. Section 27 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Requires Proceedings at Place of Residence or Employment of Aggrieved Person....

The petitioners, Ramesh s/o Mohanlal Bhutada and Shobha w/o Ramesh Bhutada, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking to quash orders dated 15.2.2010 and 18.7....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Gambling Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 6 of Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 — Police Raid Conducted Without Valid Warrant or Authorisation....

The applicants, six businessmen from Nagpur, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 3077/2011 registered at Wadi Police Station, Nagpur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive....

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 452, 406, and 506 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The appellants, Satish Sayaji Gaikwad and Kanchya Nepali @ Mahendrasingh Bha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellant, Laxman Janu Kokare, was convicted under Section 376(f) of the Indian Penal Code for the aggravated rape of a 9-year-old girl on 9 July 2004. The prosecution alleged that the appellant e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Dying Declaration Recorded by Police Officer Found Unreliable as Oral Dying Declaration to Brother Contradicted Written Version Regarding Motive....

The appellant, Baburao @ Babulal Raibhan Patole (Jadhav), was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, for the murder of his wife Sojarbai under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life impris...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Possession and Injunction — Amendment to Add Party and Alternative Claim for Possession Held Permissible Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as It Does Not Cause Prejudice and Relates Back to Original Plaint....

The Bombay High Court dismissed a civil revision application challenging an order allowing amendment of the plaint in a suit for declaration and injunction. The respondent, Mumbai Mazdoor Sabha (MMS),...