High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in NDPS Act Case for Smuggling Heroin in Suitcases. Circumstantial Evidence Including Possession of Keys, Baggage Tags, and Concealment of Contraband Sufficient to Prove Conscious Possession Under Section 21(c) of NDPS Act, 1985....

The appellant, Mrs. Agnes Ruddy Odhoch, a Kenyan national, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Sections 21(c), 23(c) read with Section 28, and Section 29 read with S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Encashment of Standby Letters of Credit in Commercial Dispute. Principle of Autonomy of Letters of Credit Upheld — Injunction Granted Only on Grounds of Fraud or Irreparable Injury, Not Breach of Underlying Contract....

The appellant, Drive India Enterprise Solutions Ltd., filed an appeal against the dismissal of its petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to restrain Responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 Income Tax Act for Mere Change of Opinion. Assessment Completed Under Section 143(3) Cannot Be Reopened Without Fresh Tangible Material....

The petitioner, Sanand Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a return for Assessment Year 2008-09 declaring income of Rs.20.33 lakhs, later revised to Rs.19.14 lakhs. The petitioner was a member of an Associati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mining Lease Recommendation Under Section 11(3) of Mines and Minerals Act. The Court upheld the Minister's recommendation for grant of mining lease to respondent no.3, finding no violation of natural justice or procedural irregularity....

The petitioner, M/s Veet Rag Homes Private Limited, challenged the order dated 25.4.2008 of the Minister (Industries & Mining) recommending grant of mining lease of bauxite ore to respondent no.3, M/s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Trial Court Order Permitting Late Filing of Written Statement Without Considering Sufficient Cause — Order VIII Rule 1 CPC. Trial Court Must Consider Grounds for Delay Before Setting Aside 'No Written Statement Order'....

The petitioner, original plaintiff, filed Regular Civil Suit No.502 of 2008 for permanent injunction against the respondents. The defendants appeared on 24/7/2008 but failed to file written statement ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's testimony was found to be unreliable and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Balu Kondiba Thengil, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of Apparao under Section 302 IPC and for house trespass under Section 452 IPC, sentenced to life imprisonment and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Set Aside No Written Statement Order — Technical Defect in Affidavit Not Fatal. Communication gap between advocate and client constitutes sufficient cause under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC for extension of time to file written statement....

The petitioners, defendants in Special Civil Suit No. 31 of 2008, challenged the order dated 12/1/2010 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Baramati, rejecting their application (Exhibit 38) to...