High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Commissioner of Customs Can Disagree with Inquiry Officer's Report Under CHA Licensing Regulations, 2004 — Full Bench resolves conflict on scope of disciplinary authority's power to differ from subordinate officer's findings....

The petitioner, M/s. Delta Logistics, a partnership firm, was a licensed Customs House Agent (CHA) under the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004. On 22nd December 2008, the Commissioner of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MCI Rejection of Seat Increase for MBBS Course. Essentiality Certificate Must Conform to Prescribed Format and OPD Strength Must Meet Minimum Requirement Under Medical Council of India Regulations....

The petitioner, Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Navi Mumbai, a deemed university, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Board of Governors of the Medical Council of India (M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition from Ahmednagar to Amravati on Grounds of Wife's Convenience. Section 12(1)(c) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Transfer Petition - Wife's difficulty in traveling due to lack of employment and need for family support considered....

The applicant, Dr. Sau. Nilima Mahesh Muley, filed a Misc. Civil Application under Section 12(1)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 377 of 2011 from th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dacoity Stolen Property Case Due to Lack of Proof of Knowledge. Conviction under Sections 411 and 412 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that appellants knew or had reason to believe the recovered ornaments were proceeds of dacoity....

The appellants, Ashok Suryabhan Kale and Bhausaheb Suryabhan Kale, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 411 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Identification of accused by witnesses was not reliable as they were not known to the witnesses prior to the incident and no test identification parade was conducted....

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Bhaskar Zumbar Kale, Narya alias Narayan Umrao Pawar, and Jalindar Shivaji Karanjkar against their conviction under Sections 457 and 394 of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trust Property Dispute — Will and Gift Deed Upheld. Court holds that a will executed by a Hindu widow in 1943 was valid and that a subsequent gift deed by a co-owner was binding on the property....

The case involves a dispute over a house property originally owned by Adkuji Palandurkar. After his death, his widow Manabai and other heirs inherited the property. Manabai executed a will on 1/4/1943...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Development Agreement in Favor of Purchasers. Agreement for Development Treated as Agreement for Sale Under Specific Relief Act, 1963 as Essential Terms Constitute Sale of Immovable Property....

The appellants, original defendants, were the owners of a property in Pune. They executed a development agreement dated 18th October 2007 in favor of the respondents, original plaintiffs, for a total ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellant, Dattatraya Hari Jadhav, was convicted by the trial court under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of his father-in-law and another individual. The prosecuti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witnesses for Cross-Examination in Civil Suit — Inherent Power Under Section 151 CPC Not Affected by Order 18 Rule 17 CPC. The court held that the trial court has power to recall witnesses for cross-examination even after they have been examined, if necessary for just decision....

The petitioners, who were defendants in a civil suit, filed an application under Order 18 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to recall the plaintiff's witnesses (...